Was LeT involved? UNSC asks Pak on J&K attack, refuses to accept ‘false flag’ claim
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has never shied away from confronting the harsh realities of terrorism and its perpetrators. Recently, the UNSC met in a closed-door session to discuss the Pahalgam attack in Jammu and Kashmir, which left several tourists injured. During the meeting, which was requested by Pakistan, the UNSC members refused to accept the “false flag” narrative peddled by Islamabad and instead questioned whether the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a Pakistan-based terrorist outfit, was involved in the attack.
The Pahalgam attack, which took place on October 11, saw a group of terrorists open fire on a bus carrying tourists in the Pahalgam area of Anantnag district in Jammu and Kashmir. The attack left several tourists injured, including a few foreigners. The incident sparked widespread outrage and concern, with many calling for the perpetrators to be brought to justice.
Pakistan, in its bid to deflect attention from its own complicity in terrorism, quickly jumped to the conclusion that the attack was a “false flag” operation, implying that it was carried out by Indian security forces to tarnish its own image. However, the UNSC members were not convinced by Islamabad’s claims and instead sought answers from Pakistan on the involvement of LeT, a group known for its role in several terrorist attacks in India.
The UNSC meeting, which was marked by a sense of urgency and gravity, saw the members discussing the Pahalgam attack and the broader issue of terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir. According to reports, some members of the UNSC brought up the targeting of tourists on the basis of their religion, highlighting the sectarian nature of the attack. This is a crucial aspect of the attack that cannot be ignored, as it underscores the toxic atmosphere of hatred and intolerance that has been nurtured by extremist elements in the region.
The refusal of the UNSC to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative is significant, as it underscores the international community’s skepticism towards Islamabad’s claims. The UNSC has consistently condemned terrorism in all its forms and has called upon countries to take concrete action against terrorist outfits. In this context, the UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s narrative can be seen as a strong message to Islamabad that it cannot use its diplomatic channels to deflect attention from its own role in terrorism.
The involvement of LeT in the Pahalgam attack is a matter of serious concern, as the group has a long history of carrying out terrorist attacks in India. LeT, which was founded by Hafiz Saeed, a notorious terrorist, has been responsible for several attacks in India, including the 2008 Mumbai attacks that killed over 160 people. The group’s links to Pakistan’s military intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), are well-documented, and many experts believe that LeT operates with the tacit support of Pakistan’s government.
The UNSC’s questioning of Pakistan on LeT’s involvement in the Pahalgam attack is a significant development, as it underscores the international community’s willingness to hold Pakistan accountable for its role in terrorism. The UNSC’s action is a clear message to Pakistan that it cannot use its diplomatic channels to shield LeT or other terrorist outfits from accountability.
In conclusion, the UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative on the Pahalgam attack and its questioning of LeT’s involvement in the attack are significant developments that highlight the international community’s determination to combat terrorism. The UNSC’s action sends a clear message to Pakistan that it cannot use its diplomatic channels to deflect attention from its own role in terrorism and that it must take concrete action against terrorist outfits like LeT.
