Was LeT involved? UNSC asks Pak on J&K attack, refuses to accept ‘false flag’ claim
In a significant development, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has refused to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative on the recent Pahalgam attack in Jammu and Kashmir. The UNSC members, who met in a closed-door session at the request of Pakistan, have instead questioned whether the terrorist outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), based in Pakistan, was likely to be involved in the attack.
The Pahalgam attack, which took place on October 7, 2022, saw a group of terrorists open fire on a bus carrying Hindu pilgrims, killing several people and injuring many others. The attack sparked widespread outrage and condemnation from across the world, with many accusing Pakistan of supporting and sponsoring terrorism in the region.
Pakistan, however, has denied any involvement in the attack, claiming that it was a “false flag” operation designed to tarnish its reputation. But the UNSC members are not convinced, and have instead called on Pakistan to provide more information and evidence to support its claims.
According to reports, some UNSC members have also raised concerns about the targeting of tourists on the basis of religion. The Pahalgam attack was the second such incident in recent months, with a similar attack taking place in Kashmir’s Bijbehara area in August, which also targeted Hindu pilgrims.
The UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative is a significant setback for the country, which has been trying to deflect attention from its own role in supporting terrorism in the region. Pakistan has long been accused of providing safe haven to terrorist groups such as LeT, which has carried out numerous attacks in India and other parts of the world.
The LeT, which was founded by Hafiz Saeed, a Pakistani terrorist and JuD chief, has been responsible for several high-profile attacks in India, including the 2008 Mumbai attacks that killed over 160 people. The group is also believed to be involved in other forms of terrorism, including the funding and training of other terrorist groups in the region.
Pakistan’s role in supporting terrorism in the region is well-documented, and the country has been subject to several sanctions and restrictions by the international community. The UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative is a further indication of the international community’s growing frustration with Pakistan’s inaction against terrorism.
The UNSC’s decision to question Pakistan’s involvement in the Pahalgam attack is also significant, as it suggests that the international community is finally starting to take concrete action against Pakistan’s role in supporting terrorism. The UNSC has called on Pakistan to provide more information and evidence to support its claims, and has also urged the country to take concrete steps to prevent the spread of terrorism in the region.
The Pahalgam attack is just the latest in a long line of terrorist incidents in Jammu and Kashmir, which have been orchestrated by Pakistan-based terrorist groups. The region has been plagued by violence and terrorism for decades, and the international community has long been calling on Pakistan to take action against these groups.
In conclusion, the UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative on the Pahalgam attack is a significant development, and a further indication of the international community’s growing frustration with Pakistan’s inaction against terrorism. The UNSC’s decision to question Pakistan’s involvement in the attack is also a welcome step, as it suggests that the international community is finally starting to take concrete action against Pakistan’s role in supporting terrorism.
News Source:
