Was LeT involved? UNSC asks Pak on J&K attack, refuses to accept ‘false flag’ claim
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has asked Pakistan to provide clarity on the recent attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which left several tourists injured. The UNSC members refused to accept Pakistan’s claim that the attack was a “false flag” operation, and instead, questioned whether the terrorist outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), which is based in Pakistan, was likely to be involved in the attack.
The development comes as a major embarrassment for Pakistan, which has been accused of using terrorist organizations to carry out attacks in India. The attack in Pahalgam, which occurred on October 8, targeted a group of tourists, leaving several people injured. Pakistan had claimed that the attack was a “false flag” operation, designed to discredit the country and create tensions between India and Pakistan.
However, UNSC members were not convinced by Pakistan’s narrative and instead, demanded that the country provide evidence to support its claim. The UNSC members reportedly brought up the fact that the attack targeted tourists on the basis of their religion, which suggests that it was a premeditated and planned attack.
The UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative is a significant development, as it suggests that the international community is not convinced by Pakistan’s claims. The UNSC’s questioning of LeT’s involvement in the attack is also a major blow to Pakistan, as it suggests that the international community is aware of the outfit’s history of carrying out terrorist attacks in India.
LeT has been responsible for several major terrorist attacks in India, including the 2008 Mumbai attacks, which killed over 160 people. The outfit has also been linked to several other terrorist attacks in India, including the 2013 Delhi High Court blast and the 2014 Peshawar school attack.
The UNSC’s questioning of LeT’s involvement in the Pahalgam attack is also significant, as it suggests that the international community is aware of the outfit’s ability to carry out attacks on behalf of Pakistan. LeT has been accused of being a proxy of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), which has been responsible for carrying out terrorist attacks in India.
The UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative is also a major setback for Pakistan, as it suggests that the international community is not willing to accept its claims without evidence. Pakistan has a history of making false claims and blaming other countries or organizations for its own mistakes. The UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s narrative is a major blow to the country’s credibility and suggests that the international community is aware of its tactics.
The attack in Pahalgam is the latest in a series of terrorist attacks in Jammu and Kashmir, which has seen a surge in violence in recent months. The attacks have been attributed to several terrorist outfits, including LeT, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM). The attacks have left several people dead and injured, and have caused widespread destruction.
The UNSC’s questioning of LeT’s involvement in the Pahalgam attack is also significant, as it suggests that the international community is aware of the outfit’s ability to carry out attacks on behalf of Pakistan. LeT has been accused of being a proxy of Pakistan’s ISI, which has been responsible for carrying out terrorist attacks in India.
The UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative is also a major setback for Pakistan, as it suggests that the international community is not willing to accept its claims without evidence. Pakistan has a history of making false claims and blaming other countries or organizations for its own mistakes. The UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s narrative is a major blow to the country’s credibility and suggests that the international community is aware of its tactics.
In conclusion, the UNSC’s questioning of LeT’s involvement in the Pahalgam attack is a significant development, as it suggests that the international community is aware of the outfit’s ability to carry out attacks on behalf of Pakistan. The UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative is also a major setback for the country, as it suggests that the international community is not willing to accept its claims without evidence. The attack in Pahalgam is a reminder of the ongoing conflict in Jammu and Kashmir and the need for the international community to take a strong stance against terrorism.
Source:
