Title: Was LeT involved? UNSC asks Pak on J&K attack, refuses to accept ‘false flag’ claim
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has raised questions about the involvement of the Pakistan-based terrorist outfit, Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), in the recent attack on tourists in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. The UNSC members, in a closed-door meeting, refused to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” narrative on the attack, as reported by various news sources.
The meeting was held in response to a request by Pakistan to discuss the Pahalgam attack, which left several tourists injured. However, instead of accepting Pakistan’s claims, the UNSC members questioned the role of LeT, which is known for its links to Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).
Pakistan has been accused of supporting and harboring terrorist groups, including LeT, which has been responsible for several attacks in India, including the 2008 Mumbai attacks. The country’s claims of a “false flag” operation, where the attack is attributed to another group to deflect attention, have been met with skepticism by several countries.
The UNSC members reportedly brought up the targeting of tourists on the basis of religion, which has been a concern for several years. The attack on the tourists in Pahalgam, who were mostly Hindus, has raised questions about the safety and security of minority communities in Jammu and Kashmir.
The meeting was held behind closed doors, and the details of the discussion are not publicly available. However, sources close to the meeting have revealed that the UNSC members were critical of Pakistan’s handling of the situation and its refusal to accept the role of LeT in the attack.
Pakistan’s foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, had earlier claimed that the attack was a “false flag” operation, and that India was trying to deflect attention from its own human rights abuses in Kashmir. However, the UNSC members have rejected this narrative, and instead, have called for Pakistan to take concrete steps to prevent the use of its territory for terrorist activities.
The UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” claim is seen as a significant development, as it indicates that the international community is not buying into Pakistan’s narrative. The UNSC has consistently condemned terrorism and called for the prevention of the use of terrorism for political gains.
The attack on the tourists in Pahalgam has raised concerns about the safety and security of minority communities in Jammu and Kashmir. The state has seen a surge in violence and terrorism in recent years, with several attacks on minority communities, including Hindus, Sikhs, and Christians.
The lack of action by Pakistan to prevent the use of its territory for terrorist activities has been a major concern for several years. The country’s refusal to accept the role of LeT in the attack and its attempts to deflect attention by blaming India are seen as a clear indication of its complicity in the attack.
The UNSC’s decision to question Pakistan’s role in the attack and to refuse to accept its “false flag” narrative is a significant blow to the country’s credibility. It is clear that the international community is no longer willing to accept Pakistan’s denials and justifications for its actions.
In conclusion, the UNSC’s refusal to accept Pakistan’s “false flag” claim on the Pahalgam attack and its questioning of LeT’s involvement are significant developments. The international community is no longer willing to accept Pakistan’s denials and justifications for its actions, and is instead calling for concrete steps to prevent the use of its territory for terrorist activities.
The attack on the tourists in Pahalgam is a clear indication of the dangers and risks faced by minority communities in Jammu and Kashmir. It is essential that the international community takes concrete steps to ensure the safety and security of these communities, and holds Pakistan accountable for its actions.
