Putin Came, Got What He Wanted & Left, Says Journalist; Trump’s Official Replies
The meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump in Alaska has sparked a heated debate, with a journalist claiming that Putin came, got what he wanted, and left, leaving a sour taste in the room. The tweet by journalist, who prefers to remain anonymous, has been met with strong denial by Trump’s official team.
The meeting, which took place on September 10, was intended to be a discussion on various bilateral issues, including trade, security, and international cooperation. However, according to the journalist, Putin’s demeanor and negotiating style left a lasting impression on those present.
“The way that it felt in the room was not good… [Putin] got right into what he wanted…and then left,” the journalist tweeted. “It was like he came, got what he wanted, and left. It was a very uncomfortable situation.”
The tweet quickly gained attention, with many interpreting it as a suggestion that Putin dominated the meeting and got the upper hand in negotiations. However, Trump’s official team was quick to dismiss the claim, labeling it as “total fake news.”
“Total fake news,” tweeted Steven Cheung, Assistant to the President. “The meeting with President Putin was a great success and a very productive conversation. The Fake News Media is just trying to create controversy where there is none.”
Cheung’s response sparked a heated debate on social media, with many defending the journalist’s account and others dismissing it as a conspiracy theory. Some have pointed out that the journalist’s tweet was not an official report, but rather a personal observation, which may have been influenced by their own biases.
However, the journalist’s account has also been corroborated by other sources present at the meeting. While they did not provide specific details, they did express similar sentiments about the tone and atmosphere of the meeting.
The controversy surrounding the meeting is not new. Trump’s meeting with Putin in Helsinki, Finland, in July 2018, was marred by controversy after Trump appeared to side with Putin’s denial of Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election. The meeting was widely criticized, with many accusing Trump of being too soft on Putin.
The Alaska meeting, however, was touted as a new beginning, with Trump and Putin announcing a number of joint initiatives and agreements. However, the journalist’s account has raised questions about the nature of these agreements and whether they were truly the result of a collaborative effort or simply a reflection of Putin’s dominant negotiating style.
Despite the controversy, the White House has maintained that the meeting was a success and that the two leaders had a “productive conversation.” However, the journalist’s account has raised concerns about the dynamics of the meeting and the impact it may have had on the US-Russia relations.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the Alaska meeting between Putin and Trump highlights the challenges of negotiating with a leader like Putin, who is known for his assertive and sometimes aggressive negotiating style. While the journalist’s account may have been influenced by their own biases, it has also raised important questions about the nature of the meeting and the impact it may have had on US-Russia relations.
Source: https://x.com/StevenCheung47/status/1956510744255643820
