Pakistan supports terror, not welcome in Gaza: Israel after Pak joins Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’
The Middle East peace process has been a longstanding and complex issue, with various countries and organizations attempting to broker a lasting resolution. Recently, US President Donald Trump unveiled his ‘Board of Peace’ initiative, aimed at promoting economic development and stability in the Gaza region. However, the inclusion of Pakistan in this initiative has sparked controversy, with Israel’s Economy Minister Nir Barkat stating that any country that supports terror is not welcome in Gaza, specifically citing Pakistan.
The ‘Board of Peace’ is a component of the Trump administration’s broader peace framework, which seeks to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through a combination of economic development, security measures, and diplomatic efforts. The board is comprised of representatives from various countries, including Pakistan, which has been a vocal supporter of the Palestinian cause. However, Israel has long accused Pakistan of supporting terrorist organizations, including those operating in the Gaza Strip.
Barkat’s comments reflect Israel’s deep-seated concerns about Pakistan’s involvement in the region. “Any country that supported terror is not welcome [in Gaza]…and that includes Pakistan,” he stated. This sentiment is not new, as Israel has consistently criticized Pakistan’s alleged support for terrorist groups, including Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. These organizations have been responsible for numerous attacks against Israeli civilians and military personnel, and Israel views Pakistan’s support for them as a significant obstacle to peace.
Despite his criticism of Pakistan, Barkat expressed strong support for the Trump administration’s peace framework, describing it as “a better alternative than the UN, which is biased.” The United Nations has long been involved in the Middle East peace process, but its efforts have been hindered by criticism of bias towards the Palestinian cause. The Trump administration’s approach, on the other hand, has been seen as more favorable to Israel, and has been welcomed by Israeli officials as a potential game-changer in the region.
The inclusion of Pakistan in the ‘Board of Peace’ has also sparked controversy due to the country’s historical support for terrorist organizations. Pakistan has long been accused of providing financial, military, and logistical support to groups like Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which have been responsible for numerous attacks against Israeli civilians and military personnel. This support has been a major point of contention between Israel and Pakistan, and has hindered efforts to promote peace and stability in the region.
In response to Barkat’s comments, Pakistani officials have defended their country’s involvement in the ‘Board of Peace’, arguing that they are committed to promoting peace and stability in the region. However, these assurances have done little to alleviate Israel’s concerns, and the controversy surrounding Pakistan’s involvement in the initiative is likely to continue.
The Trump administration’s peace framework has been the subject of intense debate and criticism, with many arguing that it is biased towards Israel and ignores the legitimate concerns of the Palestinian people. The inclusion of Pakistan in the ‘Board of Peace’ has only added to the controversy, and has sparked concerns about the potential for the initiative to be hijacked by countries with their own agendas.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Pakistan’s involvement in the ‘Board of Peace’ highlights the complex and sensitive nature of the Middle East peace process. While the Trump administration’s peace framework has been welcomed by some as a potential game-changer in the region, it has also been criticized for its perceived bias towards Israel and its failure to address the legitimate concerns of the Palestinian people. The inclusion of Pakistan in the initiative has only added to the controversy, and has sparked concerns about the potential for the initiative to be hijacked by countries with their own agendas.
As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether the ‘Board of Peace’ will be able to achieve its stated goals of promoting economic development and stability in the Gaza region. However, one thing is clear: the involvement of countries like Pakistan, which have been accused of supporting terrorist organizations, is likely to remain a major point of contention in the region.
About the Author
