No Equivalence between Pak & India: Tharoor on Colombia’s Reaction on Op Sindoor
The recent visit of the Colombian delegation to India has sparked a controversy, with Congress MP Shashi Tharoor expressing disappointment over Colombia’s decision to condole the loss of lives in Pakistan due to Operation Sindoor, rather than sympathizing with Indian victims of terrorism. Tharoor’s remarks have sparked a heated debate, with many questioning the motives behind Colombia’s stance.
In an interview with a leading news channel, Tharoor emphasized that there can be no equivalence between those who dispatch terrorists and those who resist, between those who attack and those who defend. He stressed that India is exercising its right of self-defense against terrorist attacks, and that this right cannot be questioned or equated with the actions of those who perpetrate terrorism.
Tharoor’s comments come in the wake of Colombia’s decision to offer condolences to Pakistan for the loss of lives in Operation Sindoor, a military operation launched by India in response to a terrorist attack on its territory. The Colombian delegation, led by Foreign Minister Carlos Holmes Trujillo, had met with Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan and expressed condolences for the loss of lives in the operation.
Tharoor’s reaction was immediate, with the Congress MP taking to social media to express his disappointment and disgust at Colombia’s stance. He tweeted, “Colombia’s decision to condole the loss of lives in Pakistan due to Op Sindoor is disappointing, to say the least. There can be no equivalence between those who dispatch terrorists and those who resist. India is exercising its right of self-defense, and that cannot be questioned.”
Tharoor’s remarks have been widely shared and have sparked a heated debate on social media, with many supporting his stance and others criticizing Colombia’s decision. Some have questioned the motives behind Colombia’s stance, with many arguing that the country is trying to curry favor with Pakistan in order to gain diplomatic and economic benefits.
The controversy has also raised questions about the role of foreign powers in the India-Pakistan conflict. Many have argued that foreign powers have a responsibility to take a neutral stance in the conflict, rather than taking sides. Others have argued that countries like Colombia have a right to express their opinions and sympathies, even if they do not align with India’s stance.
The controversy has also sparked a debate about the nature of terrorism and the role of foreign powers in combating it. Many have argued that terrorism is a global problem that requires a global response, and that foreign powers have a responsibility to take action against terrorist groups that threaten global security. Others have argued that the fight against terrorism is a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach, and that foreign powers should not be seen as taking sides in the conflict.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Colombia’s decision to condole the loss of lives in Pakistan due to Operation Sindoor has sparked a heated debate on social media and has raised important questions about the role of foreign powers in the India-Pakistan conflict. While some have argued that Colombia’s decision was misguided and that the country should have taken a neutral stance, others have argued that the country has a right to express its opinions and sympathies.
Ultimately, the controversy highlights the complexities of the India-Pakistan conflict and the need for a nuanced and balanced approach to resolving the issue. It also underscores the importance of foreign powers taking a neutral stance in the conflict and working together to combat the threat of terrorism.
