European Union systematically raping law: Hungarian PM
In a scathing critique of the European Union’s proposed plan to bypass member-state vetoes and indefinitely freeze Russian assets, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has accused EU officials of “systematically raping European law”. The plan, which would allow decisions to be made by majority vote and channel profits to Ukraine, has been met with fierce opposition from Orban, who has vowed to fight to restore lawful order.
The proposal, which would utilize Article 122 of the EU treaty, has been put forward as a means of increasing pressure on Russia in response to its ongoing conflict with Ukraine. However, Orban has warned that this move would mark the end of unanimity among EU member states, and would instead usher in a “Brusselian dictatorship”. The Hungarian PM’s strong words reflect the deep-seated concerns of many EU member states, who fear that the proposed plan would undermine the fundamental principles of the EU and create a power imbalance in favor of larger member states.
At the heart of the controversy is the EU’s desire to freeze Russian assets and channel the resulting profits to Ukraine. While the goal of supporting Ukraine is a noble one, the means by which the EU proposes to achieve this end have raised serious concerns about the erosion of national sovereignty and the rule of law. By bypassing the requirement for unanimity among member states, the EU would be able to impose its will on smaller member states, such as Hungary, without their consent. This would create a dangerous precedent, where the interests of larger member states are prioritized over those of smaller ones, and would undermine the very foundations of the EU.
Orban’s accusations of “systematically raping European law” are not mere rhetoric, but rather a reflection of the deep-seated concerns that many EU member states have about the proposed plan. The use of Article 122, which is intended to be used in times of extreme economic crisis, is seen as a blatant attempt to circumvent the normal decision-making processes of the EU. By invoking this article, the EU would be able to impose its will on member states without their consent, creating a situation where the rule of law is subverted in favor of political expediency.
The implications of this proposal are far-reaching and would have significant consequences for the future of the EU. If the EU is able to bypass member-state vetoes and impose its will on smaller member states, it would create a power imbalance that would be difficult to reverse. The smaller member states, such as Hungary, would be left with little recourse but to accept the dictates of the larger member states, creating a situation where the EU is no longer a union of equal partners, but rather a dictatorship of the powerful.
Orban’s warning that this move would end unanimity and create a “Brusselian dictatorship” is not an exaggeration. The EU’s proposed plan would mark a significant shift in the balance of power within the EU, where the interests of larger member states are prioritized over those of smaller ones. This would undermine the very principles of the EU, which are based on the idea of cooperation and mutual respect among member states.
The Hungarian PM’s vow to fight to restore lawful order is a testament to the determination of many EU member states to defend the principles of the EU and to prevent the erosion of national sovereignty. The proposed plan is not only a threat to the interests of Hungary, but also to the very foundations of the EU. It is a wake-up call for all EU member states to re-examine the direction of the EU and to ensure that the principles of cooperation, mutual respect, and the rule of law are upheld.
In conclusion, the European Union’s proposed plan to bypass member-state vetoes and indefinitely freeze Russian assets is a threat to the very foundations of the EU. The use of Article 122 to impose the EU’s will on smaller member states without their consent is a blatant attempt to subvert the rule of law and create a power imbalance in favor of larger member states. Orban’s accusations of “systematically raping European law” are a reflection of the deep-seated concerns that many EU member states have about the proposed plan. The Hungarian PM’s vow to fight to restore lawful order is a testament to the determination of many EU member states to defend the principles of the EU and to prevent the erosion of national sovereignty.
Source:
https://www.rt.com/news/629357-orban-eu-raping-law/amp/