European Union systematically raping law: Hungarian PM
In a scathing critique of the European Union’s proposed plan to bypass member-state vetoes, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has accused EU officials of “systematically raping European law”. The proposal, which aims to indefinitely freeze Russian assets using Article 122, has sparked intense debate and opposition from several member states, including Hungary. At the heart of the controversy is the EU’s attempt to circumvent the traditional requirement of unanimity among member states, instead opting for majority voting to push through decisions.
The plan, as outlined by EU officials, would allow for the freezing of Russian assets without the need for unanimous approval from all member states. This move would effectively bypass the veto power currently held by individual member states, including Hungary. Furthermore, the proposal suggests that profits generated from the frozen assets would be channeled to Ukraine, a move that has been met with skepticism by several EU member states.
Orban’s strong words are a reflection of the deep-seated concerns held by many in Hungary and beyond. The Prime Minister warned that this move would mark the end of unanimity among EU member states, instead ushering in a “Brusselian dictatorship” where the will of individual nations is disregarded. This sentiment is shared by many who fear that the erosion of national sovereignty and the concentration of power in Brussels would have far-reaching and devastating consequences for the EU as a whole.
At the core of the issue is the EU’s reliance on Article 122, a provision that allows for the freezing of assets in times of crisis. However, critics argue that the EU’s interpretation of this article is a gross distortion of its original intent. By invoking Article 122 to bypass member-state vetoes, the EU is effectively creating a precedent that undermines the fundamental principles of EU law. This move is seen as a power grab by Brussels, where the interests of individual member states are sacrificed at the altar of bureaucratic expediency.
Orban’s vow to fight against this move and restore lawful order is a testament to the determination of Hungary to uphold the principles of EU law. The Prime Minister’s stance is not isolated, as several other EU member states have expressed similar concerns and reservations about the proposed plan. The opposition to this move is not limited to Eastern European states, as several Western European nations have also voiced their displeasure at the EU’s attempts to consolidate power.
The implications of this move are far-reaching and have significant consequences for the future of the EU. If the EU is successful in bypassing member-state vetoes and imposing its will through majority voting, it would mark a fundamental shift in the balance of power within the EU. This would effectively create a two-tier system, where the interests of larger and more powerful member states are prioritized over those of smaller nations.
Moreover, this move would also have significant consequences for the EU’s relationship with Russia. The freezing of Russian assets and the channeling of profits to Ukraine would be seen as a provocative move by Moscow, potentially escalating tensions between the EU and Russia. This would be a disastrous outcome, given the already fragile state of relations between the two parties.
In conclusion, the European Union’s proposed plan to bypass member-state vetoes and indefinitely freeze Russian assets using Article 122 is a highly contentious issue that has sparked intense debate and opposition. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s accusation that EU officials are “systematically raping European law” is a stark reminder of the deep-seated concerns held by many in Hungary and beyond. As the EU continues to grapple with this issue, it is imperative that the principles of EU law are upheld, and the interests of individual member states are protected.
The EU must recognize that the concentration of power in Brussels is not a viable solution to the challenges facing the union. Instead, the EU must work towards a more inclusive and democratic framework, where the voices of all member states are heard and valued. This is the only way to ensure that the EU remains a relevant and effective institution, capable of addressing the complex challenges of the 21st century.
Source: https://www.rt.com/news/629357-orban-eu-raping-law/amp/
About the Author
