Meta Sued for $359 mn over Illegal Distribution of Porn: Report
In a shocking turn of events, Meta has been hit with a massive lawsuit over allegations of illegally distributing copyrighted adult films to train its AI models. The lawsuit, filed by Strike 3 Holdings and Counterlife Media, seeks damages of $359 million, which is equivalent to $150,000 per video.
According to reports, the two firms claim that Meta has been downloading around 2,400 copyrighted adult films since 2018 in illegal ways. The purpose of these downloads, they allege, was to help train Meta’s AI models. The firms argue that the videos were downloaded with the intention of distribution, which is a violation of copyright law.
The lawsuit was filed in a US court and seeks compensation for Meta’s alleged illegal activities. The firms are seeking $150,000 per video, which would total $359 million for the 2,400 copyrighted films.
This lawsuit is not the first time Meta has faced allegations of illegally distributing copyrighted content. In the past, the company has faced similar lawsuits over its use of copyrighted music and images in its products and services.
Meta’s AI models are used to power various features on its platforms, including its recommendation algorithms and content moderation tools. However, the company’s use of copyrighted content to train these models has raised concerns among content creators and owners.
The lawsuit is a significant blow to Meta, which has been facing increased scrutiny over its handling of copyrighted content. The company has faced criticism for its lack of effective measures to prevent the spread of copyrighted content on its platforms.
The news of the lawsuit comes at a time when Meta is already facing numerous challenges, including increased competition from other social media platforms and concerns over data privacy and security.
In a statement, a Meta spokesperson said that the company takes allegations of copyright infringement seriously and is reviewing the lawsuit. However, the company did not provide further comment on the matter.
The lawsuit is a reminder of the importance of respecting intellectual property rights and the need for technology companies to take effective measures to prevent the spread of copyrighted content.
As the world becomes increasingly dependent on technology, it is essential that companies like Meta take responsibility for their actions and respect the intellectual property rights of content creators and owners.
In conclusion, the lawsuit against Meta is a significant development in the ongoing debate over the spread of copyrighted content on the internet. The case highlights the importance of respecting intellectual property rights and the need for technology companies to take effective measures to prevent the spread of copyrighted content.
