Title: Hotmail Co-founder says ‘truth=anti-India’, Goenka replies ‘Living in US & lecturing us?’
In a recent tweet, Hotmail co-founder Sabeer Bhatia sparked a heated debate by claiming that those who speak the truth in India are labeled “anti-national”. This statement has been met with strong resistance from many, including billionaire Harsh Goenka, who responded with a scathing tweet of his own.
Bhatia’s original tweet read: “In India, truth is anti-India. Then who’s a national? The one who lies to you?” This statement has been widely shared and has sparked a lively discussion on social media, with many people expressing their outrage and disbelief.
However, Goenka was quick to respond, saying: “Living in California and lecturing a billion Indians back home?…India doesn’t need sermons from those who packed up and left.” This tweet was met with widespread approval and support, with many people agreeing that Goenka had effectively shut down Bhatia’s argument.
So, what lies behind Bhatia’s statement, and why did Goenka respond with such force? To understand this, it’s essential to look at the context in which Bhatia made his statement.
Bhatia, a well-known Indian entrepreneur, has been living in the United States for several years. He co-founded Hotmail, one of the pioneering email services, and later went on to found other successful companies. However, despite his success, Bhatia has been vocal about his criticism of the Indian government and its policies.
In recent years, Bhatia has been using social media platforms to express his opinions on various issues, including politics, education, and social issues. However, his views have been met with widespread criticism and even ridicule from many Indians, who accuse him of being out of touch with the country and its people.
Goenka’s response, therefore, was not just a personal attack on Bhatia, but also a commentary on the disconnect between those who have left India and those who are still living there. Goenka, who is the chairman of the RPG Group, is a well-respected businessman and entrepreneur in his own right, and his response was seen as a powerful rebuke to Bhatia’s claims.
In his tweet, Goenka was highlighting the fact that Bhatia, despite being a successful entrepreneur, has chosen to live in the United States and has been vocal about his criticism of the Indian government. Goenka was saying that Bhatia’s opinions and views, while they may be valid, are not relevant to the people of India, who are struggling to make ends meet and are trying to build a better future for themselves.
Goenka’s response also highlighted the fact that Bhatia’s statement was not just a statement of fact, but also a reflection of his own biases and prejudices. By claiming that truth is anti-India, Bhatia was implying that anyone who speaks the truth is somehow anti-national. This is a dangerous and divisive statement, and one that has been used to silence critics and dissenting voices in India for far too long.
In conclusion, the exchange between Bhatia and Goenka is a powerful reminder of the importance of context and perspective in our discussions and debates. While Bhatia’s statement may have been intended as a commentary on the state of Indian society, it was met with widespread outrage and disbelief. Goenka’s response, on the other hand, was seen as a powerful rebuke to Bhatia’s claims, and one that highlighted the disconnect between those who have left India and those who are still living there.
As we move forward, it’s essential that we continue to engage in respectful and open-minded discussions, rather than resorting to personal attacks and divisive rhetoric. By doing so, we can build a more compassionate and inclusive society, where everyone has the opportunity to thrive and reach their full potential.
News Source: https://x.com/hvgoenka/status/1951337266896679142
