Hotmail Co-founder says ‘truth=anti-India’, Goenka replies ‘Living in US & lecturing us?’
In a recent tweet, Hotmail co-founder Sabeer Bhatia sparked controversy by claiming that those who speak the truth in India are deemed “anti-national”. The statement has been met with widespread criticism and ridicule from many, including billionaire Harsh Goenka, who responded with a scathing reply.
Bhatia’s original tweet read, “In India, those who speak the truth are called ‘anti-national’. Then who’s a national? The one who lies to you?” The comment was met with a mix of shock, anger, and disbelief from many Indians, who felt that the statement was not only inaccurate but also insulting.
However, Goenka, who is the chairman of the RPG Group, was quick to respond to Bhatia’s tweet. In a tweet that has since gone viral, Goenka said, “Living in California and lecturing a billion Indians back home?…India doesn’t need sermons from those who packed up and left.”
Goenka’s response was met with widespread applause and agreement from many Indians, who felt that Bhatia’s comment was out of touch with reality. Many pointed out that Bhatia, who is now based in the United States, has no understanding of the current political climate in India and is simply speaking from a position of ignorance.
One user replied to Goenka’s tweet, saying, “Couldn’t agree more, Harsh ji! Sabeer ji, you may have co-founded Hotmail, but you’ve lost touch with reality in India. We don’t need your lectures or advice when it comes to our country’s politics.”
Another user added, “Well said, Harsh Goenka! Sabeer Bhatia should focus on his business ventures in the US and leave Indian politics to Indians. We don’t need any sermons from people who have abandoned their country.”
Bhatia’s comment has also been criticized by many for its poor timing. India is currently facing a tense political climate, with many protests and demonstrations taking place across the country. Bhatia’s statement was seen as insensitive and tone-deaf, and many felt that he was trying to stir up controversy for his own gain.
Goenka’s response, on the other hand, has been praised for its honesty and straightforwardness. Many Indians feel that Goenka’s comment was a much-needed response to Bhatia’s outlandish statement, and that he has shed light on the absurdity of Bhatia’s claim.
In conclusion, Bhatia’s comment has sparked a heated debate in India, with many people taking to social media to express their outrage and disappointment. Goenka’s response has been praised for its honesty and straightforwardness, and has been widely shared and discussed on social media.
As the debate continues to rage on, one thing is clear: Bhatia’s comment has backfired, and he has lost credibility in the eyes of many Indians. His attempt to lecture Indians on what it means to be “national” has been met with ridicule and scorn, and he has been reminded that he is no longer a part of Indian society.
