Meesho faces investor protest over anchor allotment to SBI Funds
The Indian startup ecosystem has been abuzz with the news of Meesho, a social commerce platform, facing investor protest over its anchor allotment to SBI Funds Management. According to reports, Meesho’s anchor book faced significant withdrawals from several large investors after a substantial allocation was made to SBI Funds Management. This move prompted other prominent funds to exit in protest, citing concerns over the allocation process.
The anchor book is a critical component of an initial public offering (IPO), where a company allocates a portion of its shares to institutional investors before the IPO. This is done to gauge investor interest and build momentum for the public offering. In Meesho’s case, the anchor book was expected to be a significant draw, given the company’s impressive growth trajectory and strong investor interest.
However, the allocation to SBI Funds Management, a significant player in the Indian mutual fund industry, seems to have raised eyebrows among other investors. Sources close to the matter revealed that several large funds, including Capital Group, Aberdeen Group, ICICI Prudential Asset Management, and Nippon India Life Asset Management, withdrew from the anchor book in protest. These investors were reportedly unhappy with the significant allocation to SBI Funds Management, which they perceived as unfair.
Despite this setback, Meesho’s IPO lineup still boasts an impressive array of global investors, including GIC and BlackRock. These investors have demonstrated their confidence in Meesho’s business model and growth potential, which is a testament to the company’s strengths. Meesho’s social commerce platform has been gaining traction in recent years, with a strong focus on empowering small businesses and entrepreneurs.
The controversy surrounding the anchor allotment, however, raises questions about the allocation process and the role of institutional investors in the IPO market. While anchor investors play a crucial role in providing stability and credibility to an IPO, their influence can also be significant. In this case, the allocation to SBI Funds Management may have been perceived as favoring a particular investor over others, leading to the protest.
The Indian regulatory framework, particularly the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), has guidelines in place to ensure fairness and transparency in the IPO allocation process. However, the Meesho incident highlights the need for greater clarity and consistency in the allocation process, particularly when it comes to anchor investors.
In recent years, the Indian IPO market has witnessed significant growth, with several high-profile listings making headlines. However, the Meesho incident serves as a reminder that the IPO process is not without its challenges and complexities. Companies, investors, and regulators must work together to ensure that the allocation process is fair, transparent, and in the best interests of all stakeholders.
As the Indian startup ecosystem continues to evolve, it is essential to address these concerns and ensure that the IPO process remains a level playing field for all investors. Meesho’s experience serves as a valuable lesson for companies and investors alike, highlighting the importance of transparency, fairness, and communication in the IPO allocation process.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Meesho’s anchor allotment to SBI Funds Management has sparked a significant debate about the IPO allocation process and the role of institutional investors. While Meesho’s IPO lineup still boasts an impressive array of global investors, the incident highlights the need for greater clarity and consistency in the allocation process. As the Indian startup ecosystem continues to grow and mature, it is essential to address these concerns and ensure that the IPO process remains fair, transparent, and in the best interests of all stakeholders.
About the Author
