Meesho faces investor protest over anchor allotment to SBI Funds
The Indian e-commerce platform, Meesho, has recently faced a significant backlash from investors over its anchor allotment to SBI Funds Management. According to reports, Meesho’s anchor book witnessed a substantial withdrawal from several large funds after a considerable allocation was made to SBI Funds Management. This move has prompted other prominent investors to exit in protest, citing concerns over the fairness and transparency of the allocation process.
The anchor book is a crucial component of an initial public offering (IPO), as it allows institutional investors to purchase shares before the IPO is open to the general public. The anchor investors are typically allocated a significant portion of the shares, and their participation is seen as a vote of confidence in the company’s prospects. However, in Meesho’s case, the allocation to SBI Funds Management has sparked a controversy, with several investors expressing their dissatisfaction over the move.
Among the investors who withdrew from Meesho’s anchor book were Capital Group, Aberdeen Group, ICICI Prudential Asset Management, and Nippon India Life Asset Management, among others. These investors were reportedly allocated smaller portions of the shares compared to SBI Funds Management, which led to their decision to exit the IPO. The withdrawal of these prominent investors has raised concerns over the credibility of Meesho’s IPO and the company’s ability to attract and retain investors.
Despite the controversy, Meesho’s IPO lineup still includes several global investors, such as GIC and BlackRock. These investors have demonstrated their confidence in the company’s growth prospects, and their participation is expected to provide a boost to the IPO. However, the exit of other large funds has raised questions over the company’s ability to attract a diverse range of investors and its prospects for long-term success.
The controversy surrounding Meesho’s anchor allotment to SBI Funds Management highlights the importance of transparency and fairness in the IPO allocation process. Investors expect a level playing field, where all participants are treated equally and have an equal opportunity to participate in the IPO. Any perceived unfairness or bias in the allocation process can lead to a loss of confidence among investors, ultimately affecting the company’s ability to raise capital and achieve its growth objectives.
Meesho’s experience serves as a reminder to companies and investment banks of the need to maintain transparency and fairness in the IPO process. The allocation of shares to anchor investors should be based on a clear and well-defined criteria, and all participants should be treated equally. Any deviations from this principle can lead to controversy and undermine the credibility of the IPO.
In conclusion, Meesho’s decision to allocate a significant portion of its anchor book to SBI Funds Management has sparked a controversy among investors, leading to the withdrawal of several large funds. While the company’s IPO lineup still includes several prominent global investors, the exit of other funds has raised concerns over the company’s ability to attract and retain investors. The incident highlights the importance of transparency and fairness in the IPO allocation process and serves as a reminder to companies and investment banks to maintain a level playing field for all participants.
As the Indian e-commerce market continues to grow and evolve, companies like Meesho will play an increasingly important role in shaping the industry’s future. However, to achieve long-term success, these companies must prioritize transparency, fairness, and credibility in their interactions with investors and other stakeholders. By doing so, they can build trust and confidence among investors, ultimately driving their growth and success.
The Meesho controversy also raises questions about the role of investment banks and other intermediaries in the IPO process. These entities have a critical role to play in ensuring that the IPO allocation process is fair, transparent, and compliant with regulatory requirements. Any failure to maintain these standards can lead to controversy and undermine the credibility of the IPO.
In the end, Meesho’s experience serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency, fairness, and credibility in the IPO process. As the Indian e-commerce market continues to evolve, companies and investment banks must prioritize these values to build trust and confidence among investors and other stakeholders. By doing so, they can drive growth, innovation, and success in the industry.
About the Author
