Meesho faces investor protest over anchor allotment to SBI Funds
The Indian e-commerce landscape has witnessed tremendous growth in recent years, with numerous startups emerging as key players in the industry. One such company, Meesho, has been making headlines with its upcoming initial public offering (IPO). However, the company has faced a significant setback after its anchor book faced investor withdrawals due to a substantial allocation to SBI Funds Management. This move has prompted other large funds to exit in protest, citing concerns over the allotment process.
According to reports, Meesho’s anchor book had initially attracted significant interest from prominent investors, including Capital Group, Aberdeen Group, ICICI Prudential Asset Management, and Nippon India Life Asset Management, among others. However, the allocation of a substantial portion of the anchor book to SBI Funds Management led to a change of heart among these investors. Sources close to the matter revealed that these investors withdrew from the anchor book in protest, citing concerns over the allotment process and the preferential treatment given to SBI Funds Management.
Despite this setback, Meesho’s IPO lineup still boasts an impressive array of global investors, including GIC and BlackRock. The company’s ability to attract such prominent investors is a testament to its strong growth prospects and the potential for long-term returns. However, the controversy surrounding the anchor allotment to SBI Funds Management has raised questions about the company’s allocation strategies and its relationships with key investors.
The anchor book is a critical component of any IPO, as it provides a platform for institutional investors to participate in the offering before it opens to the public. The allocation of shares to anchor investors is typically done on a discretionary basis, with the company and its bankers determining the allotment based on various factors, including the investor’s reputation, investment track record, and long-term commitment to the company.
In this context, the allocation of a significant portion of the anchor book to SBI Funds Management has raised eyebrows among other investors. While SBI Funds Management is a reputable investor with a strong track record, the perception that it received preferential treatment has led to concerns about the fairness and transparency of the allotment process.
Meesho’s decision to allocate a substantial portion of the anchor book to SBI Funds Management may have been driven by various factors, including the investor’s ability to provide long-term support to the company and its commitment to the Indian e-commerce sector. However, the company’s failure to communicate its allocation strategies effectively to other investors has led to a breakdown of trust and a loss of confidence in the IPO process.
The controversy surrounding Meesho’s anchor allotment to SBI Funds Management serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and fairness in the IPO process. Companies must ensure that their allocation strategies are clear, consistent, and communicated effectively to all investors. Failure to do so can lead to a loss of confidence among investors, ultimately affecting the company’s ability to raise capital and achieve its growth objectives.
In conclusion, Meesho’s IPO has faced a significant setback due to the controversy surrounding the anchor allotment to SBI Funds Management. While the company has managed to attract prominent global investors, including GIC and BlackRock, the withdrawal of other large funds in protest has raised concerns about the fairness and transparency of the allotment process. As the Indian e-commerce sector continues to grow and evolve, companies must prioritize transparency and fairness in their IPO processes to maintain investor confidence and achieve long-term success.
About the Author
