$100,000 Fee Should Be Per Yr, Says X User as US Startup Offers to Sponsor H1-B, CTO Replies
The H1-B visa program has been a topic of discussion for many years, with the US government imposing various fees on applicants. Recently, a US-based startup, Metaview, made headlines by offering to sponsor the $100,000 fee imposed by the US government on H1-B visas. However, an X user took to the platform to express their opposition to the move, stating that the fee should be paid per year, not as a one-time payment.
The controversy began when Metaview put up a banner outside IIT-Delhi, offering to sponsor the $100,000 fee for H1-B visas. The move was seen as an attempt to attract top talent from India to work for the company in the US. However, the X user, who prefers to remain anonymous, took issue with the offer, saying, “[The] fee should be per year, not one time fee.” The user’s comment sparked a debate on the platform, with many users weighing in on the issue.
The company’s Co-Founder and CTO, Shahriar Tajbakhsh, responded to the post in a lighthearted manner, jokingly saying, “Make it per day. I’ll set up a recurring payment.” The response was met with laughter and applause from many users, who appreciated the CTO’s sense of humor. However, others felt that the issue was more serious and deserved a more thoughtful response.
The H1-B visa program is a non-immigrant visa that allows US companies to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations. The program is popular among tech companies, who use it to hire skilled workers from around the world. However, the program has been criticized for its complexity and the high fees associated with it. The $100,000 fee imposed by the US government is a significant burden for many applicants, who often have to pay the fee out of their own pocket.
The issue of H1-B visa fees is a complex one, with many stakeholders involved. The US government imposes the fees as a way to generate revenue and to deter companies from abusing the program. However, the fees can be a significant burden for applicants, who often have to pay the fee out of their own pocket. The fees can also be a barrier to entry for smaller companies, who may not have the resources to pay the fee.
Metaview’s offer to sponsor the $100,000 fee is seen as a way to attract top talent to the company. The company is competing with other tech giants for the best and brightest minds, and the offer is seen as a way to differentiate itself from its competitors. However, the issue of whether the fee should be paid per year or as a one-time payment is a matter of debate.
The X user who opposed the offer argued that the fee should be paid per year, not as a one-time payment. The user’s argument is that the fee is a significant burden for applicants, and paying it per year would make it more manageable. The user also argued that paying the fee per year would ensure that the applicant is committed to working for the company for a longer period.
On the other hand, the company’s CTO argued that paying the fee per day is not a feasible option. The CTO’s response was lighthearted, but it highlights the complexity of the issue. The company has to balance its desire to attract top talent with the need to manage its costs. Paying the fee per day would be a significant burden for the company, and it may not be a viable option.
In conclusion, the issue of H1-B visa fees is a complex one, with many stakeholders involved. Metaview’s offer to sponsor the $100,000 fee is seen as a way to attract top talent to the company, but the issue of whether the fee should be paid per year or as a one-time payment is a matter of debate. The X user who opposed the offer argued that the fee should be paid per year, not as a one-time payment, while the company’s CTO argued that paying the fee per day is not a feasible option. Ultimately, the issue requires a thoughtful and nuanced approach, taking into account the needs of all stakeholders involved.
News Source: https://x.com/s16h_/status/1996615907142221858