$100,000 Fee Should Be Per Yr, Says X User as US Startup Offers to Sponsor H1-B, CTO Replies
The recent announcement by US-based startup Metaview to sponsor H1-B visas for potential employees has sparked a lively debate on social media platforms. The company had put up a banner outside IIT-Delhi, offering to cover the $100,000 fee imposed by the US government for H1-B visas. However, one X user took to the platform to express their disagreement with the offer, stating that the fee should be paid per year, not as a one-time payment.
The X user’s post quickly gained attention, and the company’s Co-Founder and CTO, Shahriar Tajbakhsh, responded with a dash of humor. “Make it per day. I’ll set up a recurring payment,” he joked, highlighting the absurdity of the user’s demand. The exchange has since gone viral, with many users weighing in on the issue.
For those who may not be familiar with the H1-B visa program, it is a non-immigrant visa that allows US companies to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations. The program is highly competitive, and the US government imposes a significant fee on companies that sponsor H1-B visas. The $100,000 fee mentioned in Metaview’s offer is likely a reference to the costs associated with sponsoring an H1-B visa, which can include filing fees, attorney fees, and other expenses.
Metaview’s offer to sponsor H1-B visas is undoubtedly an attractive one, especially for international students and professionals who are looking to work in the US. The company’s willingness to cover the costs associated with the visa program can be a major selling point for potential employees who may be deterred by the high fees. However, the X user’s comment highlights the need for companies to consider the long-term costs of sponsoring H1-B visas.
The H1-B visa program is designed to allow US companies to employ foreign workers for a specific period, typically up to three years. However, the visa can be extended for an additional three years, and in some cases, employees may be eligible for permanent residency. If a company sponsors an H1-B visa, they are responsible for covering the costs associated with the visa for the duration of the employee’s stay in the US. This can include not only the initial filing fees but also the costs of renewing the visa and potentially sponsoring the employee for a green card.
In this context, the X user’s demand that the $100,000 fee should be paid per year is not entirely unreasonable. While it may seem excessive, it highlights the need for companies to consider the long-term costs of sponsoring H1-B visas. If Metaview is serious about attracting top talent from around the world, they may need to factor in the costs of sponsoring H1-B visas over an extended period.
Of course, Shahriar Tajbakhsh’s response to the X user’s comment was likely intended to be humorous, rather than a serious offer to pay the fee per day. However, it does highlight the absurdity of the user’s demand and the need for a more nuanced discussion about the costs and benefits of sponsoring H1-B visas.
As the debate around H1-B visas and immigration policy continues, it is essential to consider the perspectives of all stakeholders, including companies, employees, and the US government. While Metaview’s offer to sponsor H1-B visas is undoubtedly a positive step, it is crucial to recognize the complexities and challenges associated with the visa program.
In conclusion, the exchange between the X user and Metaview’s CTO highlights the need for a more informed discussion about the costs and benefits of sponsoring H1-B visas. While the company’s offer is undoubtedly attractive, it is essential to consider the long-term costs and implications of sponsoring H1-B visas. As the US continues to grapple with the challenges of immigration policy, it is crucial to prioritize a nuanced and informed discussion that takes into account the perspectives of all stakeholders.