Wasim Akram takes dig at IPL’s duration with ‘Kids grow up’ remark, gets trolled
The Indian Premier League (IPL) has been a subject of discussion and debate among cricket fans and experts for years. While some praise the league for its entertainment value and the platform it provides to young cricketers, others criticize its duration and the impact it has on international cricket. Recently, former Pakistan captain Wasim Akram joined the debate, taking a dig at the IPL’s duration with a remark that has sparked a lot of reactions on social media.
In a statement that was seen as a veiled attack on the IPL, Akram said, “Bachche bade ho jate hain…woh league khatam hi nahi hoti. (Kids grow up…but that league just never ends).” The comment was perceived as a criticism of the IPL’s lengthy schedule, which typically lasts for about two months. Akram’s remark was likely intended to highlight the difference in duration between the IPL and other T20 leagues, such as the Pakistan Super League (PSL), which he has been involved with in the past.
However, Akram’s comment did not go down well with many fans, who were quick to troll him on social media. One fan commented, “Kids grow up…become big players, retire…and then still go on to play in PSL.” This comment was a tongue-in-cheek reference to the fact that many retired players, including some from Pakistan, continue to participate in the PSL. Another fan wrote, “Whether…league ends or not…Pakistanis’ obsession with IPL just never ends.” This comment was a sarcastic remark about the perceived fascination of Pakistani fans with the IPL, despite the existence of their own T20 league, the PSL.
The reactions to Akram’s comment highlight the complexities of the debate surrounding the IPL’s duration. On one hand, the league’s lengthy schedule can be seen as a positive aspect, providing a platform for young players to gain experience and exposure. On the other hand, the long duration can also be criticized for disrupting the international cricket calendar and causing player fatigue.
It is worth noting that the IPL’s duration has been a topic of discussion among cricket administrators and experts for some time. The league’s schedule has been tweaked over the years to accommodate international cricket fixtures and to reduce the workload on players. However, the debate is far from over, and opinions on the matter continue to be divided.
In addition to the debate about the IPL’s duration, Akram’s comment also sparked a discussion about the relative merits of the IPL and the PSL. Akram, who has been involved with the PSL in the past, has consistently praised the league and its impact on Pakistani cricket. However, his comment about the IPL’s duration was seen as a attempt to promote the PSL as a superior alternative.
The PSL has indeed been a success story for Pakistani cricket, providing a platform for young players to develop their skills and gain international recognition. The league has also helped to promote cricket in Pakistan, with many matches being played in front of packed crowds. However, the PSL still lags behind the IPL in terms of its financial resources and global reach.
In conclusion, Wasim Akram’s comment about the IPL’s duration has sparked a lively debate among cricket fans and experts. While some have praised Akram for speaking his mind, others have criticized him for his perceived bias towards the PSL. The debate highlights the complexities of the issue and the need for a nuanced discussion about the IPL’s duration and its impact on international cricket.
As the debate continues, it is essential to consider the various perspectives and opinions on the matter. The IPL’s duration is just one aspect of the larger discussion about the future of T20 cricket and its impact on the sport as a whole. By engaging in a constructive and respectful dialogue, we can work towards finding solutions that benefit the sport and its stakeholders.
About the Author
