Rohit Sharma Wanted to Play Against England and Retire Mid-Series Like Dhoni: Report
Cricket enthusiasts were left stunned when Rohit Sharma announced his retirement from Test cricket in September 2021, just months after taking over as the team’s captain. However, a recent report by Sky Sports has shed light on a fascinating detail that could have changed the course of events. According to the report, Rohit Sharma had initially wanted to play in the upcoming Test series against England and retire mid-series, just like his idol MS Dhoni did in 2014.
For those who may not remember, MS Dhoni surprised the cricket world by announcing his retirement from Test cricket in the middle of a Test series against Australia in 2014. The series was being played at the time, and Dhoni decided to call it quits, leaving the team and fans in shock. The news sent ripples across the cricket fraternity, and many speculated about the reasons behind his sudden decision.
Fast forward to 2021, and Rohit Sharma was facing a similar dilemma. With the Test series against England just around the corner, Rohit had reportedly expressed his desire to play in the series and then retire, just like Dhoni did all those years ago. However, the BCCI selectors had other plans.
According to the Sky Sports report, the selectors offered Rohit the opportunity to play in the series, but not as captain. This decision was said to have been a significant factor in Rohit’s eventual decision to retire from Test cricket altogether.
It’s worth noting that Rohit had taken over as the Test captain after Virat Kohli stepped down from the role, and the team was facing a tough series against England. The pressure to perform was immense, and Rohit’s decision to retire was seen as a shocking move by many cricket fans.
The report by Sky Sports provides a fascinating insight into the inner workings of the Indian cricket team and the complex relationships between players and selectors. It’s clear that Rohit’s desire to play in the series and then retire was not just about personal satisfaction but also about his desire to give the team a chance to prepare for the series without the pressure of his captaincy.
The news has sparked a lot of debate among cricket fans, with many wondering what could have been if Rohit had been allowed to play in the series and then retire mid-series. Would the team have performed better under his leadership? Would the retirement have been a more dignified one?
One thing is certain, however â Rohit’s decision to retire from Test cricket has sent shockwaves across the cricket fraternity, and the debate is likely to continue for a long time to come.
Rohit’s retirement from Test cricket has also raised questions about the team’s leadership structure and the role of selectors in the team’s decision-making process. The Indian cricket team has been plagued by leadership issues in recent years, with several captains stepping down from the role due to various reasons.
The selectors’ decision to not offer Rohit the captaincy for the England series has sparked a lot of debate, with many questioning the logic behind the decision. Was it a case of selectors wanting to give someone else a chance to lead the team, or was it a result of Rohit’s declining form in Test cricket?
The answer to these questions is likely to remain a mystery, but one thing is certain â the Indian cricket team is facing a leadership crisis, and it’s up to the selectors to find a solution to this problem.
In conclusion, Rohit Sharma’s decision to retire from Test cricket has sent shockwaves across the cricket fraternity, and the debate is likely to continue for a long time to come. The recent report by Sky Sports has provided a fascinating insight into the inner workings of the Indian cricket team, and it’s clear that Rohit’s desire to play in the series and then retire was a complex decision that was influenced by several factors.
