Kohli Would’ve Hit a Ton If He’d Batted Instead of Gill: Manjrekar
The ongoing Test series between India and England has witnessed some thrilling moments, with both teams showcasing their batting prowess. In the second Test at Lord’s, India’s Shubman Gill played a crucial knock, scoring 50 runs in the second innings. However, former India cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar believes that if Virat Kohli had batted instead of Gill, he would have scored a century.
In an interview, Manjrekar shared his thoughts on Kohli’s batting and how it has evolved over the years. He stated that Kohli’s performance used to get enhanced by his natural aggression, which allowed him to score big. On the other hand, Manjrekar observed that Gill’s batting at Lord’s seemed tentative, and aggression may not be his natural demeanor.
Manjrekar’s comments have sparked a debate about the styles of play adopted by the two batsmen. While Kohli has built a reputation for his aggressive approach, Gill has been more cautious in his innings. The former India cricketer believes that Kohli’s natural aggression would have allowed him to score a century if he had batted instead of Gill.
Gill’s batting style has been the subject of much discussion, with some critics suggesting that he is trying to emulate Kohli’s aggressive approach. Manjrekar has advised Gill to focus on building his own brand of cricket rather than trying to replicate someone else’s style. He believes that Gill’s natural game is more suited to the traditional Indian batting style, which emphasizes longevity and patience.
Manjrekar’s comments have also sparked a debate about the role of aggression in modern cricket. While aggression can be an effective way to score runs, it is not the only way to succeed at the top level. Gill’s cautious approach has allowed him to build a strong foundation, which has helped him to score big in Tests.
The debate about aggression in cricket is not new, and it has been a topic of discussion for many years. Some cricket experts believe that aggression is a key component of modern cricket, while others argue that it is not the most effective way to score runs. The debate has been fueled by the differing styles of play adopted by Kohli and Gill, with the former known for his aggressive approach and the latter more cautious.
The ongoing Test series between India and England has witnessed some thrilling moments, with both teams showcasing their batting prowess. In the second Test at Lord’s, India’s Shubman Gill played a crucial knock, scoring 50 runs in the second innings. However, former India cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar believes that if Virat Kohli had batted instead of Gill, he would have scored a century.
In an interview, Manjrekar shared his thoughts on Kohli’s batting and how it has evolved over the years. He stated that Kohli’s performance used to get enhanced by his natural aggression, which allowed him to score big. On the other hand, Manjrekar observed that Gill’s batting at Lord’s seemed tentative, and aggression may not be his natural demeanor.
Manjrekar’s comments have sparked a debate about the styles of play adopted by the two batsmen. While Kohli has built a reputation for his aggressive approach, Gill has been more cautious in his innings. The former India cricketer believes that Kohli’s natural aggression would have allowed him to score a century if he had batted instead of Gill.
Gill’s batting style has been the subject of much discussion, with some critics suggesting that he is trying to emulate Kohli’s aggressive approach. Manjrekar has advised Gill to focus on building his own brand of cricket rather than trying to replicate someone else’s style. He believes that Gill’s natural game is more suited to the traditional Indian batting style, which emphasizes longevity and patience.
The debate about aggression in cricket is not new, and it has been a topic of discussion for many years. Some cricket experts believe that aggression is a key component of modern cricket, while others argue that it is not the most effective way to score runs. The debate has been fueled by the differing styles of play adopted by Kohli and Gill, with the former known for his aggressive approach and the latter more cautious.
In conclusion, Manjrekar’s comments have sparked a debate about the styles of play adopted by Kohli and Gill. While Kohli’s aggressive approach has allowed him to score big, Gill’s more cautious approach has also been effective. Ultimately, the key to success in cricket is finding a style that works for you and sticking to it.
