Jadeja, Sundar should have continued batting after tons: Parthiv
The ongoing Test series between India and England has been a rollercoaster ride, with both teams showcasing their skills and determination. The fourth Test at Old Trafford was a thrilling encounter, with India’s all-rounders Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar scoring centuries to help their team take a lead. However, their innings were cut short, and many have questioned the decision to declare the innings. One such voice is that of former India wicketkeeper-batter Parthiv Patel, who feels that Jadeja and Sundar should have continued batting after scoring their tons.
In an interview, Parthiv expressed his surprise at the decision to declare the innings, given the situation of the game. “I was surprised when they declared the innings. I felt that Jadeja and Sundar should have batted through the day, especially after scoring their centuries,” he said. Parthiv’s sentiments were echoed by many cricket fans and experts, who felt that the duo’s innings was cut short prematurely.
Parthiv also drew parallels with a similar situation that unfolded in the same match. Ben Duckett, an English batter, was batting on 90 when he was asked to shake hands with the Indian bowlers, effectively ending his innings. Parthiv couldn’t help but question the logic behind this decision, asking, “If Ben Duckett had been batting on 90…and the opposition offered a handshake, would England have accepted it?” He added, “I’m very curious to know this.”
The decision to declare the innings has been a topic of debate, with some arguing that it was a tactical move to put pressure on the English batsmen, while others feel that it was a premature decision that allowed the opposition to take control of the game. Parthiv, however, feels that the decision was a mistake, and that Jadeja and Sundar’s innings should have been allowed to continue.
The Indian all-rounders had put on a brilliant show, with Jadeja scoring 83 off 165 balls and Sundar scoring 60 off 150 balls. Their partnership had added 121 runs for the seventh wicket, and had taken India’s lead to 139 runs. However, their innings was cut short when Jadeja was dismissed by Stuart Broad, and Sundar followed soon after.
Parthiv’s comments have sparked a lively debate in the cricketing community, with many fans and experts weighing in on the decision to declare the innings. While some have defended the decision, citing the need to put pressure on the English batsmen, others have criticized it, feeling that it was a mistake that allowed the opposition to take control of the game.
The decision to declare the innings has also raised questions about the team’s approach to the game. India had taken a lead of 139 runs, and had the opportunity to continue batting and try to take the game away from England. However, the decision to declare the innings has given the opposition a chance to take control of the game, and many feel that it was a mistake.
In conclusion, Parthiv Patel’s comments have sparked a lively debate in the cricketing community, with many fans and experts weighing in on the decision to declare the innings. While some have defended the decision, citing the need to put pressure on the English batsmen, others have criticized it, feeling that it was a mistake that allowed the opposition to take control of the game. As the series continues, it will be interesting to see how the teams approach the game, and whether the decision to declare the innings will prove to be a turning point in the series.
