Iyer’s Popularity Denies Inglis & Wadhera Credit for Win vs MI: Ashwin
The Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025 has been a rollercoaster ride for fans, with unexpected twists and turns at every corner. The latest revelation from the tournament has come from none other than Ravichandran Ashwin, the seasoned spinner of Chennai Super Kings (CSK). In an interview, Ashwin expressed his opinion that the popularity of Punjab Kings (PBKS) captain Shreyas Iyer denied the credit that Josh Inglis and Nehal Wadhera deserved for their team’s win against Mumbai Indians (MI) in Qualifier 2.
Ashwin’s comments have sent shockwaves through the cricketing fraternity, with many fans and experts taking to social media to share their thoughts on the matter. So, what did Ashwin exactly say that has caused this commotion? Let’s dive into the details.
According to Ashwin, Iyer’s popularity was the reason behind the lack of recognition for Inglis and Wadhera’s outstanding performances in the match. “Whenever they needed boundary, Iyer got it. But the game-changing [batters were Inglis and] Wadhera,” Ashwin said. He emphasized that these two players played a crucial role in taking their team to victory, but their contributions were overshadowed by Iyer’s heroics.
One of the key moments that Ashwin highlighted was Inglis’s 20-run over against Jasprit Bumrah in the powerplay. This incredible display of batting left many in awe, and it’s no surprise that Ashwin praised the young Australian’s skills. “Inglis played a 20-run over against Jasprit Bumrah in the powerplay,” Ashwin said, adding, “Inglis played a 20-run over against Jasprit Bumrah in the powerplay.”
Ashwin’s comments are not without merit. Inglis and Wadhera’s performances did go under the radar, with many fans and experts focusing on Iyer’s impressive century. However, it’s essential to remember that a team’s success is often the result of collective efforts, and both Inglis and Wadhera played a vital role in PBKS’s win.
Ashwin’s words have also sparked a debate about the media’s role in shaping public perception. Are they too quick to focus on popular players, thereby denying credit to those who are equally deserving? This is a crucial question that has been asked in various sports, not just cricket.
Inglis’s 20-run over against Bumrah was a masterclass display of batting, and it’s a testament to his skills that he was able to dominate one of the best fast bowlers in the world. Wadhera, on the other hand, played a steady hand, providing support to Inglis and helping PBKS chase down MI’s total.
Ashwin’s comments have also raised questions about Iyer’s leadership. While he did play a crucial role in PBKS’s win, his captaincy has been under scrutiny in the past. Some have questioned his decision-making, particularly in the latter stages of the tournament. However, it’s essential to remember that a captain is only as good as his team, and PBKS’s win would not have been possible without the contributions of Inglis, Wadhera, and other players.
In conclusion, Ashwin’s comments have sparked a lively debate about the importance of recognizing individual performances in a team sport. While Iyer’s century was undoubtedly impressive, it’s essential to remember that Inglis and Wadhera played a crucial role in PBKS’s win. Ashwin’s words are a reminder that cricket is a team sport, and every player’s contribution is vital to the team’s success.
