
People’s Personality Types Can Predict Which Exercise They Enjoy: Study
When it comes to exercising, everyone has their own preferences and habits. Some people thrive in high-intensity workouts, while others prefer low-key activities like yoga or walking. But did you know that your personality type can actually predict which exercises you’ll enjoy and how much benefit you’ll get from them?
A recent study published in Frontiers in Psychology has shed some light on this topic, and the findings are fascinating. Researchers analyzed the exercise preferences of over 1,000 participants, taking into account their personality traits, exercise habits, and physical fitness levels. The study aimed to explore whether personality types could predict which exercises individuals would enjoy and how much they would benefit from them.
The study’s findings suggest that personality traits can indeed play a significant role in determining our exercise preferences. Here are some key takeaways:
Extroverted people prefer HIIT workouts
According to the study, extroverted individuals tend to prefer high-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts. HIIT involves short bursts of intense exercise followed by brief periods of rest or low-intensity activity. This type of workout is often associated with increased energy expenditure and improved cardiovascular fitness. Extroverted individuals, who tend to be outgoing and sociable, may enjoy the social aspect of HIIT workouts, which often involve group fitness classes or partner exercises.
Neurotic individuals prefer private low-intensity workouts
On the other hand, individuals with high levels of neuroticism tend to prefer private, low-intensity workouts. Neurotic individuals may be more sensitive to criticism or pressure, making them more likely to prefer solo activities or low-stress exercises like yoga or walking. These individuals may also benefit from the calming effects of exercise, which can help reduce stress and anxiety.
Conscientious individuals like structured and schedule-based activities
The study also found that conscientious individuals tend to prefer structured and schedule-based exercise activities. Conscientious people are often goal-oriented and detail-focused, making them more likely to enjoy activities that involve a clear plan or schedule. This could include activities like weightlifting, jogging, or swimming, which require a specific routine or schedule.
Other personality traits also play a role
The study also examined the role of other personality traits, such as agreeability, openness to experience, and extraversion. The researchers found that individuals who scored high on agreeability tended to prefer group fitness classes or activities that involved working with others. Those who scored high on openness to experience tended to prefer activities that involved exploration or creativity, such as dance or martial arts.
Implications for exercise programs
So, what do these findings mean for exercise programs and personal trainers? The study suggests that tailoring exercise programs to an individual’s personality type can be an effective way to increase motivation and adherence. For example, an extroverted individual might be more likely to stick with a HIIT workout program if it involves group classes or social activities. A neurotic individual, on the other hand, might benefit from private, low-stress workouts that allow them to work at their own pace.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the study published in Frontiers in Psychology provides valuable insights into the relationship between personality types and exercise preferences. By understanding our individual personality traits and exercise habits, we can create personalized exercise programs that are more likely to motivate and engage us. Whether you’re an extroverted HIIT enthusiast or a neurotic yoga practitioner, there’s a workout out there that’s tailored to your unique personality and preferences.
Source:
Frontiers in Psychology. (2025). Can Personality Traits Predict Exercise Preferences and Adherence? A Systematic Review. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1587472
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1587472/full