Pak Used Unarmed Drones & Loitering Munitions: CDS Anil Chauhan
The ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan have been a subject of concern for the international community, with both countries engaging in a series of clashes and counter-clashes along the Line of Control (LoC). In a recent statement, Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan shed some light on the tactics employed by Pakistan during the recent conflict in May. According to General Chauhan, Pakistan used unarmed drones and loitering munitions, but none of them were able to inflict any damage on the Indian military or civilian infrastructure.
General Chauhan’s statement came as a surprise to many, as the use of drones and loitering munitions is a relatively new development in modern warfare. These types of weapons are designed to linger over a target area for an extended period, gathering intelligence and providing targeting data to other forces. However, in the case of Pakistan’s use of these weapons, it appears that they were not equipped with explosives or other destructive capabilities.
According to General Chauhan, most of the drones and loitering munitions used by Pakistan were neutralized through kinetic and non-kinetic means. Kinetic means would refer to the use of military force to destroy the drones, while non-kinetic means might include electronic warfare or other forms of disruption. Some of the drones were even recovered in almost intact condition, suggesting that Pakistan’s military may have been experimenting with these types of weapons without fully developing their capabilities.
The use of unarmed drones and loitering munitions by Pakistan raises several questions about the effectiveness of these weapons in modern warfare. On one hand, these types of weapons can provide valuable intelligence and targeting data, allowing military forces to strike at enemy positions with greater precision. On the other hand, they can also be vulnerable to electronic warfare and other forms of disruption, making them less effective in certain situations.
In the case of the recent conflict between India and Pakistan, it appears that the use of unarmed drones and loitering munitions by Pakistan was more of a tactical decision than a strategic one. By using these weapons, Pakistan may have been trying to probe India’s defenses and gather intelligence on Indian military positions and movements. However, the fact that most of these weapons were neutralized through kinetic and non-kinetic means suggests that India’s military was well-prepared to deal with this type of threat.
The use of unarmed drones and loitering munitions by Pakistan also raises questions about the country’s military capabilities and its ability to conduct sustained military operations. In recent years, Pakistan’s military has been focused on counter-terrorism operations in the tribal regions, and it is unclear whether the country has the resources and capabilities to conduct a large-scale conventional conflict.
In conclusion, the use of unarmed drones and loitering munitions by Pakistan during the recent conflict in May is a significant development in the ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan. While these weapons may have provided Pakistan with some tactical advantages, they were ultimately unable to inflict significant damage on Indian military or civilian infrastructure. As tensions between the two countries continue to escalate, it will be important to monitor the development of these types of weapons and their potential implications for military operations in the region.
Source:
