Vote Chori’ Phrase an Insult; Should We Share CCTV Footage of Mothers & Sisters Voting?: EC
The phrase “vote chori” (vote theft) has become a common term in the current electoral landscape, with many politicians, including Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, using it to claim that elections are rigged. However, the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), Gyanesh Kumar, has criticized this phrase, calling it an insult to the Constitution. In a recent statement, he also raised concerns about the privacy of voters, particularly women, and questioned whether the Election Commission should share CCTV footage of polling booths to prove the integrity of the electoral process.
The “vote chori” phrase has been widely used by politicians to express their discontent with the electoral process and to question the credibility of the Election Commission. However, the CEC has termed this phrase as an insult to the Constitution, which guarantees the right to vote to every citizen of the country. The Constitution empowers the Election Commission to conduct free and fair elections, and the Commission has taken several measures to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.
The CEC’s criticism of the “vote chori” phrase is not limited to its insulting nature. He has also raised concerns about the impact of such phrases on the democratic process. The CEC has stated that such phrases can create a sense of distrust among voters and undermine the credibility of the electoral process. Moreover, they can also lead to violence and chaos at polling booths, which can compromise the safety and security of voters.
The CEC’s concerns about the “vote chori” phrase are also linked to the privacy of voters, particularly women. In a democratic country like India, the privacy of voters is a fundamental right, and the Election Commission has a responsibility to protect this right. The CEC has questioned whether the Election Commission should share CCTV footage of polling booths to prove the integrity of the electoral process. He has asked a rhetorical question, “Should the Election Commission share the CCTV videos of any voter, including their mothers, daughters-in-law?”
The CEC’s question is a valid one. Sharing CCTV footage of polling booths can compromise the privacy of voters, particularly women. In a country where women still face discrimination and harassment, the privacy of their voting process is a matter of great concern. The Election Commission has taken several measures to ensure the privacy of voters, such as conducting secret balloting and ensuring that the secrecy of the voting process is maintained.
Moreover, sharing CCTV footage of polling booths can also create a sense of surveillance and mistrust among voters. Voters may feel that their every move is being watched and recorded, which can compromise their ability to exercise their fundamental right to vote freely and fairly. The Election Commission has a responsibility to ensure that voters feel safe and secure while casting their votes, and sharing CCTV footage of polling booths can undermine this sense of security.
The CEC’s criticism of the “vote chori” phrase and his concerns about the privacy of voters are not limited to the current electoral landscape. They are part of a broader debate about the role of technology in the electoral process. In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards the use of technology in elections, including the use of electronic voting machines (EVMs) and voter-verifiable paper audit trails (VVPATs). While technology can improve the efficiency and transparency of the electoral process, it can also create new challenges and concerns.
For example, the use of EVMs and VVPATs can create new opportunities for tampering and manipulation. The Election Commission has taken several measures to ensure the security and integrity of these machines, but there is always a risk that they can be tampered with or manipulated. Moreover, the use of technology can also create new challenges for voters, particularly those who are not familiar with it. The Election Commission has a responsibility to ensure that voters are aware of how to use these machines and that they are able to cast their votes freely and fairly.
In conclusion, the “vote chori” phrase is an insult to the Constitution and can create a sense of distrust among voters. The CEC’s criticism of this phrase is valid, and his concerns about the privacy of voters are also justified. The Election Commission has a responsibility to ensure that voters feel safe and secure while casting their votes, and sharing CCTV footage of polling booths can compromise this sense of security. The Commission should focus on ensuring the integrity of the electoral process and protecting the privacy of voters, rather than sharing CCTV footage of polling booths.
Source:
