Those bursting crackers should be called ‘anti-national’: Maneka
As the festive season approaches, the debate around firecrackers and their impact on the environment has once again gained momentum. BJP leader Maneka Gandhi has sparked a controversy by calling for a nationwide ban on firecrackers, citing the severe air pollution in New Delhi as the primary reason. According to Gandhi, the bursting of firecrackers is not only harmful to the environment but also anti-national.
Gandhi’s statement came on Sunday, when she emphasized the need for a complete ban on firecrackers across the country. She argued that the massive amount of money spent on firecrackers, estimated to be around ₹800 crore in just two nights, is a significant contributor to the deteriorating air quality in Delhi. “If you will burst firecrackers worth ₹800 crore in two nights, then what will happen to the air?” she asked, highlighting the alarming situation.
The BJP leader’s remarks have sparked a heated debate, with many supporting her stance on the issue. Gandhi’s argument is that those who burst firecrackers, despite being aware of the harm it causes to the environment, should be branded as “anti-national.” This statement has raised eyebrows, with some criticizing her for using strong language to describe those who engage in this activity.
However, Gandhi’s concern about air pollution in Delhi is not unfounded. The city’s air quality has been a major concern for several years, with the situation worsening during the festive season. The bursting of firecrackers releases toxic pollutants into the air, including particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and volatile organic compounds. These pollutants can cause respiratory problems, cardiovascular disease, and even cancer.
The impact of air pollution on public health is a significant concern, and the government has been under pressure to take concrete steps to address the issue. While some cities have implemented measures such as odd-even traffic rules and restrictions on construction activities, the problem persists. The ban on firecrackers, as suggested by Gandhi, could be a step in the right direction, but it requires a more comprehensive approach to tackle the root causes of air pollution.
Gandhi’s statement has also raised questions about the cultural significance of firecrackers in Indian festivals. Firecrackers have been an integral part of Indian festivals, particularly Diwali, for centuries. While some argue that firecrackers are an essential part of the festive spirit, others believe that the tradition can be continued without causing harm to the environment.
In recent years, there has been a growing awareness about the environmental impact of firecrackers, and many people have started opting for eco-friendly alternatives. Some cities have also introduced “green crackers” that are supposed to be less polluting than traditional firecrackers. However, the effectiveness of these alternatives is still a topic of debate.
As the debate around firecrackers and air pollution continues, it is essential to consider the broader implications of Gandhi’s statement. While branding those who burst firecrackers as “anti-national” may be seen as an extreme measure, it highlights the need for a more nuanced discussion around environmental issues. The fact that air pollution is a significant concern in India, and that firecrackers are a contributing factor, cannot be ignored.
In conclusion, Maneka Gandhi’s call for a nationwide ban on firecrackers has sparked a necessary debate around the environmental impact of this tradition. While the statement may be seen as controversial, it highlights the need for a more comprehensive approach to addressing air pollution in India. As the country struggles to balance its cultural heritage with the need to protect the environment, it is essential to consider the long-term consequences of our actions. Ultimately, the decision to ban firecrackers or find alternative solutions requires a collective effort from the government, citizens, and stakeholders to prioritize public health and the environment.
News Source: https://repository.inshorts.com/articles/en/PTI/05dfed30-2874-4e50-8c78-37383df29516