Tharoor is not with us, won’t invite him to party events: Congress’ Muraleedharan
The ongoing debate over Shashi Tharoor’s stance on the India-Pakistan conflict has taken a new turn with Congress leader K Muraleedharan stating that the Thiruvananthapuram MP would not be invited to any party programme until he “changes his stance” of supporting the Centre. This bold statement by Muraleedharan has sparked a heated debate within the Congress party, with many calling for unity and others backing Tharoor’s stance.
Tharoor, a member of the Congress Working Committee, has been facing backlash from his party colleagues for his recent statements in support of the Centre’s actions towards Pakistan. While addressing a rally in Kerala, Tharoor had said that the nation comes first, and that he would not compromise on national security. His comments were seen as a departure from the party’s stance, which has been critical of the Centre’s handling of the situation.
Muraleedharan’s comments, made on Sunday, were seen as a significant development in the ongoing controversy. The senior Congress leader stated that Tharoor’s stance was not aligned with the party’s views, and that he would not be invited to any party programme until he changed his stance. “He’s not with us,” Muraleedharan said, in a clear indication of the party’s disapproval of Tharoor’s views.
Tharoor, however, has refused to back down, and has instead defended his stance. In a statement, he said that he was standing by his comments, and that the nation comes first. “I am not going to compromise on national security,” Tharoor said. “The nation comes first, and that is what I have been saying.”
The controversy has raised questions about the party’s unity and the role of its leaders. While some have backed Tharoor’s stance, others have criticized him for going against the party’s views. The party’s leadership has been under pressure to take a tough stance on the issue, and Muraleedharan’s comments have only added to the tension.
The Congress party has been facing criticism for its handling of the situation, with many accusing it of being weak and divided. The party’s leaders have been struggling to present a united front on the issue, and the controversy has only added to the pressure.
Tharoor’s stance has also been criticized by some within the party, who have accused him of going against the party’s views. “Tharoor’s comments were not only incorrect, but also harmful to the party,” said a senior party leader. “He is not representing the party’s views, and his actions are causing confusion among the people.”
On the other hand, Tharoor has received support from some quarters, who have praised his stance as bold and courageous. “Tharoor is standing by his principles, and we appreciate his courage,” said a party worker. “He is not compromising on national security, and that is what the nation needs.”
The controversy has also raised questions about the role of individual leaders in the party. While some have argued that Tharoor’s comments were a personal opinion and did not reflect the party’s views, others have suggested that he was representing the party’s views and that his comments were a reflection of the party’s stance.
In recent years, the Congress party has faced several challenges, including internal divisions and a lack of leadership. The controversy over Tharoor’s stance has only added to the party’s woes, and it remains to be seen how the party will emerge from this crisis.
In conclusion, the controversy over Tharoor’s stance on the India-Pakistan conflict has sparked a heated debate within the Congress party, with some backing his views and others criticizing him for going against the party’s stance. While Muraleedharan’s comments have added to the tension, Tharoor has refused to back down, and the controversy is likely to continue for some time. The party’s leadership will have to take a tough stance on the issue and work to present a united front.
