Title: Shashi Tharoor shares 4 reasons why Trump’s ceasefire post on India & Pak was ‘disappointing’
In a recent tweet, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor expressed his disappointment over US President Donald Trump’s post on a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Tharoor, a known critic of the Indian government’s handling of the Kashmir issue, has shared four reasons why Trump’s post was “disappointing”. In his tweet, Tharoor highlighted that Trump’s post implied a “false equivalence” between the victim and the perpetrator, offered Pakistan a negotiating framework which it hadn’t earned, “internationalised” the Kashmir dispute, and “re-hyphenated” India and Pakistan.
Trump’s tweet, which sparked widespread debate and criticism, read: “I am appealing to both India and Pakistan that they live peacefully and work towards peace and stability in the region. I am confident that they will be able to resolve their differences through dialogue.”
Tharoor’s response to Trump’s tweet was swift and scathing. In his tweet, he wrote: “Disappointing tweet, Mr President. Your ceasefire post between India & Pak implies a ‘false equivalence’ between victim & perpetrator, offers Pak a negotiating framework it hasn’t earned, ‘internationalises’ the Kashmir dispute & ‘re-hyphenates’ India & Pak. #India #Pakistan #Kashmir”
Tharoor’s first reason for disappointment was that Trump’s tweet implied a “false equivalence” between the victim and the perpetrator. According to Tharoor, this is a problematic approach because it diminishes the suffering of the victims of terrorism and suggests that both sides are equally responsible for the violence.
Tharoor’s second reason for disappointment was that Trump’s tweet offered Pakistan a negotiating framework which it hadn’t earned. According to Tharoor, Pakistan has a history of supporting terrorism and sponsoring terrorist activities in India, and it has not taken adequate steps to prevent the use of its territory for terrorist activities.
Tharoor’s third reason for disappointment was that Trump’s tweet “internationalised” the Kashmir dispute. According to Tharoor, the Kashmir dispute is a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan, and it should be resolved through dialogue between the two countries. Tharoor believes that internationalising the issue will only complicate the situation and make it more difficult to resolve.
Tharoor’s fourth and final reason for disappointment was that Trump’s tweet “re-hyphenated” India and Pakistan. According to Tharoor, this means that Trump’s tweet created a false equivalence between the two countries, implying that they are equal partners in a conflict. Tharoor believes that this approach is misguided and ignores the fact that India has been a victim of terrorism sponsored by Pakistan.
Tharoor’s criticism of Trump’s tweet has sparked widespread debate and criticism on social media. Many have praised Tharoor for speaking truth to power and calling out Trump’s flawed approach to the Kashmir issue. Others have criticized Tharoor for being too critical of Trump and not doing enough to promote dialogue between India and Pakistan.
In conclusion, Shashi Tharoor’s criticism of Trump’s ceasefire post between India and Pakistan highlights the need for a nuanced and balanced approach to the Kashmir issue. Tharoor’s four reasons for disappointment – the implication of a “false equivalence” between the victim and the perpetrator, the offer of a negotiating framework to Pakistan without it earning it, the “internationalisation” of the Kashmir dispute, and the “re-hyphenation” of India and Pakistan – are all valid criticisms of Trump’s approach. Tharoor’s criticism highlights the need for a more thoughtful and informed approach to the Kashmir issue, one that takes into account the suffering of the victims of terrorism and the need for dialogue between India and Pakistan.
Source: https://x.com/shashitharoor/status/1921962732972302677
