Shashi Tharoor Shares 4 Reasons Why Trump’s Ceasefire Post on India & Pak was ‘Disappointing’
US President Donald Trump’s recent post on a ceasefire between India and Pakistan has been met with disappointment by several quarters, including Congress MP Shashi Tharoor. Tharoor, who has been vocal about his views on international affairs, took to social media to express his discontent with Trump’s post, sharing four reasons why he found it “disappointing”.
In his tweet, Tharoor stated that Trump’s post was “disappointing” because it implied a “false equivalence” between the victim and perpetrator. He argued that this approach ignores the fact that Pakistan has been accused of supporting terrorism and using it as a tool to exert influence over India, whereas India has been the victim of Pakistan’s aggression.
Tharoor also claimed that Trump’s post offered Pakistan a negotiating framework which it hasn’t earned. He pointed out that Pakistan has not taken concrete steps to curb terrorism or dismantle its support infrastructure, and therefore should not be given a platform to negotiate with India.
Furthermore, Tharoor argued that Trump’s post “internationalises” the Kashmir dispute, which is a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan. He claimed that this move will only complicate the situation and create more problems for the region.
Lastly, Tharoor stated that Trump’s post “re-hyphenates” India and Pakistan, meaning that it implies that the two countries are still bound together by a historical relationship that needs to be addressed. However, Tharoor claimed that this is no longer the case, and that India has moved on from its past conflicts with Pakistan.
Tharoor’s views on Trump’s post have been echoed by several other experts and commentators, who have also criticized the US President’s approach to the Kashmir dispute. Many have argued that Trump’s post was premature and ignores the complex history of the region, as well as the ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan.
It is worth noting that Trump’s post was made in response to a tweet by the Indian Foreign Minister, S Jaishankar, who had stated that India was willing to talk to Pakistan but only if it takes concrete steps to curb terrorism. Trump’s post appeared to suggest that the US was willing to mediate the talks between India and Pakistan, but his approach has been met with skepticism by many experts.
Tharoor’s criticism of Trump’s post is not the first time that he has expressed his views on international affairs. He has been a vocal critic of the Modi government’s handling of the Kashmir dispute, and has argued that the government’s approach has been heavy-handed and ineffective.
In conclusion, Shashi Tharoor’s views on Trump’s ceasefire post on India and Pakistan are a stark reminder of the complexities and challenges that lie ahead in resolving the Kashmir dispute. His criticisms of Trump’s approach are well-founded, and highlight the need for a more nuanced and balanced approach to the issue.
