Title: Shashi Tharoor shares 4 reasons why Trump’s ceasefire post on India & Pak was ‘disappointing’
India and Pakistan have been engaged in a bitter conflict over the Kashmir region for decades, with both countries having a significant stake in the dispute. Recently, US President Donald Trump posted a tweet suggesting a ceasefire between the two countries, which sparked a heated debate in the international community. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, a prominent figure in Indian politics, has since come forward to express his disappointment with Trump’s post, citing four reasons why it is a step in the wrong direction.
Tharoor took to Twitter to share his thoughts, saying that Trump’s post was “disappointing” and that it failed to address the complexities of the Kashmir issue. He claimed that the tweet implied a “false equivalence” between the victim and the perpetrator, and that it offered Pakistan a negotiating framework that it had not earned.
In his tweet, Tharoor wrote: “Trump’s ceasefire post on India & Pakistan is disappointing. It implies false equivalence between victim & perpetrator, offers Pakistan a negotiating framework it hasn’t earned, internationalises the Kashmir dispute & re-hyphenates India & Pakistan. #Kashmir #India #Pakistan”
Tharoor’s first point was that Trump’s tweet implied a “false equivalence” between the two countries. He argued that India is the victim of Pakistan’s aggression, and that the two countries are not equals in this dispute. He claimed that by implying a false equivalence, Trump’s tweet undermined India’s position and gave Pakistan a sense of legitimacy that it does not deserve.
Tharoor’s second point was that the tweet offered Pakistan a negotiating framework that it had not earned. He claimed that Pakistan has consistently refused to acknowledge India’s sovereignty over Kashmir, and that it has not made any concessions in the past. He argued that by offering Pakistan a negotiating framework, Trump’s tweet gave the country a sense of entitlement that it has not earned.
Tharoor’s third point was that the tweet “internationalised” the Kashmir dispute. He claimed that the dispute is a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan, and that it should be resolved through diplomatic channels. He argued that by internationalising the issue, Trump’s tweet put pressure on India to make concessions that it is not willing to make.
Tharoor’s fourth and final point was that the tweet “re-hyphenated” India and Pakistan. He claimed that India and Pakistan have had strained relations in the past, and that the two countries have had a history of conflict. He argued that by re-hyphenating the two countries, Trump’s tweet suggested that they are still connected in a way that is not true.
In conclusion, Tharoor’s tweet suggests that Trump’s ceasefire post on India and Pakistan was disappointing for four reasons. Firstly, it implied a false equivalence between the two countries, which undermined India’s position and gave Pakistan a sense of legitimacy that it does not deserve. Secondly, it offered Pakistan a negotiating framework that it had not earned, which gave the country a sense of entitlement that it has not earned. Thirdly, it internationalised the Kashmir dispute, which put pressure on India to make concessions that it is not willing to make. Finally, it re-hyphenated India and Pakistan, which suggested that the two countries are still connected in a way that is not true.
News Source: https://x.com/shashitharoor/status/1921962732972302677
