Sanatan Dharma has ruined India, says NCP-SCP MLA Awhad; sparks row
In a recent controversy, NCP (Sharad Chandra Pawar) MLA Jitendra Awhad sparked a heated debate by stating that Sanatan Dharma has “ruined India” and its ideology is “perverted”. His comments came in response to the acquittal of all seven accused, including Pragya Thakur and Lt Colonel Prasad Purohit, in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case by a special NIA court on Thursday.
Awhad’s statement has drawn widespread attention and criticism from various quarters, with many labeling it as an attempt to stoke communal tensions and divide the society. The NCP-SCP MLA, however, has refused to back down from his statement, claiming that his words were “based on facts” and that he is not afraid of criticism.
For many years, Sanatan Dharma has been a dominant force in Indian society, with its beliefs and practices shaping the country’s cultural and religious landscape. While some see it as a symbol of Indian culture and heritage, others view it as a source of divisive and exclusionary ideologies.
Awhad’s statement is not the first time that a politician has made a provocative comment about Sanatan Dharma. In recent years, there have been several instances of political leaders and public figures making controversial remarks about the ideology and its adherents.
However, Awhad’s statement is particularly notable for its vehemence and its timing. The acquittal of the Malegaon blasts accused has sparked widespread outrage and anger among many Indians, particularly from the Muslim community. Awhad’s statement has added fuel to the fire, with many accusing him of trying to exploit the situation for political gain.
In response to the controversy, Awhad has claimed that his statement was not intended to offend any particular community or group. He has also accused his critics of trying to silence him and stifle debate. “I am not afraid of criticism,” he said in an interview. “I am a leader and I will speak the truth, even if it is uncomfortable for some people.”
Awhad’s statement has also been criticized by several other political leaders and public figures. “Sanatan Dharma is a fundamental part of Indian culture and heritage,” said a spokesperson for the BJP. “It is not fair to label it as ‘perverted’ or say that it has ‘ruined India’.”
The controversy has also sparked a debate about the role of religion in Indian politics. While some argue that religion should be kept separate from politics, others believe that it is an important part of Indian culture and identity.
The acquittal of the Malegaon blasts accused has also raised questions about the nature of the investigation and the prosecution’s case. The accused were charged with conspiring to commit the blasts, which killed 37 people and injured many more. The acquittal has sparked widespread outrage and anger, with many calling for an independent inquiry into the investigation and prosecution.
In conclusion, Awhad’s statement has sparked a controversy that has divided Indian society. While some see it as a legitimate critique of Sanatan Dharma, others view it as an attempt to stoke communal tensions and divide the society. The acquittal of the Malegaon blasts accused has also raised important questions about the nature of the investigation and the prosecution’s case.
