Oppn walks out amid SIR debate, Shah says ‘But I said infiltrators should get out’
The Indian Parliament witnessed a dramatic turn of events on a recent day, as Opposition MPs staged a walkout during Home Minister Amit Shah’s address. The walkout was sparked by a heated debate over the issue of Special Identification Registers (SIR), with the Opposition accusing the government of attempting to exclude certain communities from the voter lists. However, in a sharp retort, Shah took a dig at the Opposition, saying that they raised the issue of SIR to keep illegal immigrants in the voter lists. “But I said infiltrators should get out,” Shah said, eliciting laughter from other members of the Parliament.
The debate began with the Opposition MPs expressing concerns over the government’s plans to implement SIR, which they claimed would lead to the exclusion of certain communities, particularly minorities, from the voter lists. The Opposition argued that the SIR would be used to target specific groups and deny them their right to vote. However, Shah countered this argument, saying that the SIR was necessary to identify and deport illegal immigrants who had infiltrated into the country.
Shah’s statement sparked a heated reaction from the Opposition, with many MPs rising to protest against the government’s plans. The atmosphere in the Parliament became increasingly tense, with MPs from both sides engaging in a war of words. The Opposition accused the government of attempting to polarize the electorate and create divisions along communal lines. However, Shah remained firm, reiterating that the SIR was necessary to protect the country’s borders and prevent illegal immigration.
As the debate raged on, the Opposition MPs decided to stage a walkout, protesting against the government’s stance on the SIR issue. However, Shah’s response to the walkout was swift and sharp. “But I said infiltrators should get out,” he said, sparking laughter from other members of the Parliament. The statement was seen as a clear indication of the government’s commitment to tackling the issue of illegal immigration, and its determination to ensure that only genuine citizens are included in the voter lists.
The walkout by the Opposition MPs was widely seen as a strategic move, aimed at highlighting their concerns over the SIR issue and putting pressure on the government to reconsider its plans. However, Shah’s response suggested that the government was unlikely to back down, and that it would press ahead with the implementation of the SIR.
The issue of SIR has been a contentious one, with many civil society groups and activists expressing concerns over its potential impact on marginalized communities. The Opposition has argued that the SIR would be used to target specific groups, particularly minorities, and deny them their right to vote. However, the government has maintained that the SIR is necessary to protect the country’s borders and prevent illegal immigration.
As the debate over the SIR issue continues, it remains to be seen how the government will proceed with its plans. However, one thing is clear – the issue has the potential to become a major flashpoint in the run-up to the next general elections. The Opposition is likely to continue to press the government on the issue, and the government will need to respond to the concerns of civil society groups and activists.
In the end, the walkout by the Opposition MPs and Shah’s sharp retort highlighted the deep divisions that exist between the government and the Opposition on the issue of SIR. While the government sees the SIR as a necessary measure to protect the country’s borders, the Opposition views it as a threat to the rights of marginalized communities. As the debate continues, it is likely that the issue will become increasingly polarized, with both sides dug in and refusing to budge.
The SIR debate has also raised questions about the government’s commitment to protecting the rights of all citizens, regardless of their background or community. While the government has maintained that the SIR is necessary to prevent illegal immigration, many have argued that it is a thinly veiled attempt to exclude certain communities from the voter lists. As the issue continues to simmer, it remains to be seen how the government will respond to the concerns of civil society groups and activists.
In conclusion, the walkout by the Opposition MPs and Shah’s sharp retort highlighted the deep divisions that exist between the government and the Opposition on the issue of SIR. While the government sees the SIR as a necessary measure to protect the country’s borders, the Opposition views it as a threat to the rights of marginalized communities. As the debate continues, it is likely that the issue will become increasingly polarized, with both sides dug in and refusing to budge.
News source: https://www.youtube.com/watch
About the Author
