Govt did exactly what I recommended: Shashi Tharoor on Op Sindoor
The recent controversy surrounding Operation Sindoor has sparked a heated debate within the Congress party, with some members criticizing the government’s actions and others defending them. One such member is Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who has come out in support of the government’s decision, stating that they did exactly what he recommended in a column after the Pahalgam attack. In a surprising move, Tharoor has expressed his disagreement with the party’s stance on the matter, saying that he cannot criticize what he himself suggested.
Tharoor’s comments have raised eyebrows within the party, with some members questioning his stance on the issue. However, Tharoor remains unapologetic, stating that he supported the government’s actions fully. “How do you expect me to criticise what I myself recommended? I supported it fully,” he said, explaining his position on the matter. This statement has sparked a debate within the party, with some members feeling that Tharoor’s comments are at odds with the party’s official stance on the issue.
To understand Tharoor’s stance, it is essential to look at his column, where he outlined how India should respond to the Pahalgam attack. In the article, Tharoor argued that the government should take a strong stance against the perpetrators of the attack, and that a decisive response was necessary to prevent future attacks. He also emphasized the need for a coordinated effort to tackle the issue, involving multiple agencies and stakeholders.
Tharoor’s column was widely read and discussed, and his recommendations were seen as a sensible and pragmatic approach to dealing with the situation. When the government eventually took action, Tharoor felt that they had done exactly what he had recommended, and therefore, he could not criticize their actions.
The controversy surrounding Operation Sindoor has highlighted the differences within the Congress party on how to deal with national security issues. While some members have criticized the government’s actions, others, like Tharoor, have come out in support of them. This divide has sparked a debate within the party, with some members feeling that the party’s stance on national security needs to be re-evaluated.
Tharoor’s comments have also sparked a debate outside the party, with some analysts feeling that his stance is at odds with the party’s traditional stance on national security. However, Tharoor’s supporters argue that his comments are a reflection of his commitment to finding practical solutions to complex problems, rather than simply following the party line.
In recent years, Tharoor has been known for his outspoken views on various issues, including national security. His comments on Operation Sindoor are just the latest example of his willingness to speak his mind, even if it means going against the party line. While this approach has earned him both praise and criticism, Tharoor remains unapologetic, stating that he is committed to doing what he believes is right, even if it means going against the party’s stance.
The controversy surrounding Operation Sindoor has also highlighted the complexities of dealing with national security issues. The situation requires a nuanced and multi-faceted approach, involving multiple stakeholders and agencies. Tharoor’s comments have sparked a debate on how to balance the need for a strong response to attacks with the need to protect human rights and prevent civilian casualties.
As the debate continues, it is essential to consider the complexities of the issue and the various perspectives involved. Tharoor’s comments have added a new dimension to the debate, highlighting the need for a pragmatic and sensible approach to dealing with national security issues. While the controversy surrounding Operation Sindoor is likely to continue, Tharoor’s comments have sparked a necessary debate on how to approach these complex issues.
In conclusion, Tharoor’s comments on Operation Sindoor have sparked a debate within the Congress party and outside it. His willingness to speak his mind and support the government’s actions, even if they go against the party line, has earned him both praise and criticism. As the debate continues, it is essential to consider the complexities of the issue and the various perspectives involved. Tharoor’s comments have added a new dimension to the debate, highlighting the need for a pragmatic and sensible approach to dealing with national security issues.
News source: https://x.com/pradip103/status/2015265846512488667
About the Author
