Gangs of Gandhinagar’ misusing agencies: Congress on National Herald row
The National Herald case has been a longstanding controversy in Indian politics, with the Congress party and its leaders, including Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, facing allegations of financial irregularities. Recently, a Delhi court refused to take cognisance of the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) money laundering case against the Gandhis, sparking a fresh wave of reactions from the Congress party. The party has alleged that the case was a deliberate attempt by the Centre to target its leadership, with Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera stating, “The gangs of Gandhinagar’s misuse of central agencies stands exposed today.”
The term “Gangs of Gandhinagar” is a reference to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah, who hail from Gandhinagar, the capital city of Gujarat. The Congress party’s accusation suggests that the Modi government is using central agencies such as the ED to harass and intimidate its political opponents. This is not the first time that the Congress has made such allegations, as it has consistently claimed that the BJP-led government is misusing its power to settle scores with its rivals.
The National Herald case revolves around the alleged financial irregularities in the acquisition of the National Herald newspaper by a company called Young Indian Private Limited, in which Sonia and Rahul Gandhi have a majority stake. The ED had filed a money laundering case against the Gandhis, alleging that they had used the company to launder money and acquire assets worth hundreds of crores. However, the Delhi court’s refusal to take cognisance of the case has dealt a significant blow to the ED’s investigation.
The Congress party has welcomed the court’s decision, with Pawan Khera stating that it was a “victory of truth” and a “defeat for the Modi government’s conspiracy.” The party has also accused the government of using the ED and other central agencies to target its leaders and stifle dissent. “The Modi government has been using the ED, CBI, and Income Tax department to harass and intimidate its opponents,” Khera said. “But the people of India will not be fooled by these tactics, and the truth will ultimately prevail.”
The BJP, on the other hand, has dismissed the Congress party’s allegations, stating that the law will take its course and that the Gandhis will have to face the consequences of their actions. The party has also accused the Congress of trying to politicise the issue and divert attention from its own corruption and misgovernance.
The National Herald case has significant implications for Indian politics, as it involves some of the most prominent leaders of the country. The case has also sparked a wider debate about the use of central agencies to target political opponents and the need for greater transparency and accountability in governance. As the case continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the Congress party and the BJP will react and what the ultimate outcome will be.
In the meantime, the Congress party has vowed to continue its fight against the Modi government’s alleged misuse of power and to protect its leaders from what it sees as a witch-hunt. The party has also called for greater scrutiny of the government’s actions and for the protection of democratic institutions and the rule of law.
As the battle between the Congress and the BJP continues, it is clear that the National Herald case will remain a major point of contention in Indian politics. The case has already sparked a significant amount of controversy and debate, and it is likely to continue to do so in the coming days and weeks. Ultimately, the outcome of the case will depend on the evidence and the law, but it is clear that the Congress party will continue to fight vigorously to protect its leaders and its interests.
In conclusion, the National Herald case is a complex and contentious issue that has significant implications for Indian politics. The Congress party’s allegations of the “Gangs of Gandhinagar” misusing central agencies to target its leadership have sparked a fresh wave of controversy and debate. As the case continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the parties involved will react and what the ultimate outcome will be.
About the Author
