Gangs of Gandhinagar’ misusing agencies: Congress on National Herald row
The National Herald case has been a longstanding point of contention between the Indian National Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Recently, a Delhi court refused to take cognisance of the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) money laundering case against Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, dealing a significant blow to the Centre’s efforts to target the Congress leadership. In response, the Congress party has come out swinging, alleging that the case was a blatant attempt by the Centre to misuse central agencies and target its leadership.
According to Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera, “The gangs of Gandhinagar’s misuse of central agencies stands exposed today.” The term “Gangs of Gandhinagar” is a reference to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah, who are both from Gujarat, with Gandhinagar being the state capital. This phrase is a scathing critique of the BJP’s leadership, implying that they are using their power to manipulate and control central agencies for their own political gain.
The National Herald case revolves around allegations of financial irregularities and money laundering by the Gandhi family in their acquisition of the National Herald newspaper. The ED had filed a chargesheet against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, and other Congress leaders, accusing them of using Congress party funds to pay off debts owed by the Associated Journals Limited (AJL), the company that published the National Herald. However, the court’s refusal to take cognisance of the ED’s case has raised questions about the motivations behind the Centre’s actions.
The Congress party has long maintained that the National Herald case is a politically motivated attack on its leadership. By using terms like “Gangs of Gandhinagar,” the party is attempting to shift the narrative and put the spotlight on the BJP’s alleged misuse of power. This is not the first time that the Congress has accused the BJP of using central agencies to target its leaders. In the past, the party has alleged that the ED, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and other agencies have been used to harass and intimidate its leaders, as well as those of other opposition parties.
The implications of the court’s decision are significant, as they suggest that the ED’s case against the Gandhi family may not have been as strong as initially thought. The Congress party is likely to use this as a propaganda tool to attack the BJP and its leadership, arguing that the case was a baseless and politically motivated attack on its leadership. On the other hand, the BJP may attempt to downplay the court’s decision, arguing that it is a minor setback and that the case against the Gandhi family is still ongoing.
As the National Herald case continues to unfold, it is clear that the stakes are high for both the Congress and the BJP. The case has the potential to damage the reputation of the Gandhi family and the Congress party as a whole, and could potentially have significant implications for the party’s chances in upcoming elections. At the same time, the BJP’s handling of the case could also have significant implications for its own reputation and credibility, particularly if it is seen as using central agencies to target its political opponents.
In conclusion, the National Herald case is a complex and multifaceted issue that has significant implications for Indian politics. The Congress party’s allegations of the “Gangs of Gandhinagar” misusing central agencies are a serious critique of the BJP’s leadership and their handling of the case. As the case continues to unfold, it will be important to watch how the BJP responds to these allegations, and how the court’s decision ultimately affects the parties involved.
About the Author
