Gangs of Gandhinagar’ misusing agencies: Congress on National Herald row
The National Herald case has been a longstanding point of contention between the Indian National Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The case, which involves allegations of financial irregularities and money laundering, has been a thorn in the side of the Congress leadership, particularly Sonia and Rahul Gandhi. Recently, a Delhi court refused to take cognisance of the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) money laundering case against the Gandhis, dealing a significant blow to the agency’s efforts to prosecute them.
In response to the court’s decision, the Congress party has come out swinging, alleging that the case was nothing more than a desperate attempt by the Centre to target its leadership. According to Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera, “The gangs of Gandhinagar’s misuse of central agencies stands exposed today.” This statement is particularly significant, as “Gangs of Gandhinagar” is a term that has been used to refer to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah, who both hail from Gandhinagar, Gujarat.
The Congress party has long maintained that the National Herald case is a politically motivated witch-hunt, designed to harass and intimidate its leaders. The party has pointed out that the case is based on flimsy evidence and is a clear example of the BJP’s attempts to use central agencies to settle scores with its opponents. By using the term “Gangs of Gandhinagar,” the Congress is drawing attention to what it sees as a pattern of behavior by the Modi government, where central agencies are used to target opposition leaders and undermine their credibility.
The National Herald case itself is complex and involves allegations of financial irregularities and money laundering. The case centres around the acquisition of Associated Journals Limited (AJL), the company that published the National Herald newspaper, by a company called Young Indian Private Limited (YI). The ED has alleged that YI, which is controlled by Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, acquired AJL through a series of transactions that involved the misuse of funds and the laundering of money.
However, the Congress party has consistently maintained that the allegations are baseless and that the transactions were all legitimate. The party has pointed out that the ED’s case is based on a series of flimsy assumptions and that the agency has failed to provide any concrete evidence to support its allegations.
The court’s decision to refuse cognisance of the ED’s case is a significant setback for the agency and the BJP. The decision suggests that the court is not convinced by the evidence presented by the ED and that the agency’s case is not strong enough to warrant further investigation. This decision is likely to be seen as a major victory for the Congress party and its leaders, who have been facing intense scrutiny and pressure over the National Herald case.
The Congress party’s allegations of misuse of central agencies are not new. The party has consistently maintained that the Modi government is using agencies like the ED, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and the Income Tax Department to target opposition leaders and undermine their credibility. The party has pointed out that the government is using these agencies to settle scores with its opponents and to silence critics.
The use of the term “Gangs of Gandhinagar” by the Congress party is significant, as it suggests that the party sees a pattern of behavior by the Modi government. The term implies that the government is using central agencies to target opposition leaders and undermine their credibility, and that this is a deliberate and coordinated effort. By using this term, the Congress party is drawing attention to what it sees as a major threat to democracy and the rule of law in India.
In conclusion, the National Herald case is a complex and contentious issue that has been a point of contention between the Congress party and the BJP for many years. The court’s decision to refuse cognisance of the ED’s case is a significant setback for the agency and the BJP, and is likely to be seen as a major victory for the Congress party and its leaders. The Congress party’s allegations of misuse of central agencies are serious and warrant further investigation. The use of the term “Gangs of Gandhinagar” by the Congress party is significant, as it suggests that the party sees a pattern of behavior by the Modi government that is a threat to democracy and the rule of law in India.
About the Author
