Defamatory & Unacceptable: SCBA on Dubey’s Remark on Judiciary
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has issued a strong condemnation against the remarks made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey against the judiciary. In a recent statement, Dubey had alleged that the Supreme Court is responsible for inciting religious wars in India. The SCBA has termed this statement as “defamatory” and “amounting to contempt of the Supreme Court.”
In a strongly worded resolution, the SCBA said, “This statement is not only defamatory but also amounts to contempt of the Supreme Court. This attack on the institution of the Supreme Court is unacceptable.” The SCBA also emphasized that the judiciary is an independent and impartial institution that is essential to the functioning of a democratic society.
Dubey’s remarks were made in the context of the ongoing controversy surrounding the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, which has sparked tensions between Hindus and Muslims. The BJP MP had said that the Supreme Court is the only one responsible for inciting religious wars in India, sparking widespread outrage and condemnation from various quarters.
The SCBA’s resolution has been widely welcomed by legal experts and activists who have termed Dubey’s remarks as “unacceptable” and “an attack on the very fabric of the Constitution.” The resolution has also been hailed as a strong defense of the judiciary and its independence.
The SCBA’s condemnation of Dubey’s remarks is significant because it highlights the importance of maintaining the independence and integrity of the judiciary. The judiciary is an essential institution in a democratic society, and its independence is crucial to ensuring the rule of law and protecting individual rights.
In recent years, there have been growing concerns about the erosion of judicial independence in India. The SCBA’s resolution is a timely reminder of the importance of defending the judiciary and upholding its independence.
The SCBA’s resolution has also been welcomed by various legal experts and activists who have called for Dubey to be held accountable for his remarks. Many have argued that Dubey’s comments amount to contempt of the Supreme Court and that he should be taken to task for his actions.
The SCBA’s resolution is also significant because it highlights the importance of maintaining the integrity of the judiciary. The judiciary is an institution that is supposed to be above politics, and its independence is essential to ensuring the rule of law and protecting individual rights.
In conclusion, the SCBA’s resolution condemning Dubey’s remarks is a welcome development that highlights the importance of maintaining the independence and integrity of the judiciary. Dubey’s remarks were unacceptable and defamatory, and he should be held accountable for his actions. The judiciary is an essential institution in a democratic society, and its independence is crucial to ensuring the rule of law and protecting individual rights.
