Defamatory & Unacceptable: SCBA on Dubey’s Remark on Judiciary
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has recently issued a resolution condemning the remarks made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey against the judiciary. The statement, which has been widely criticized, has been deemed “defamatory” and “unacceptable” by the SCBA, with the organization stating that it amounts to contempt of the Supreme Court.
Dubey’s statement, which was made recently, sparked widespread outrage and condemnation from various quarters. According to reports, he said that the Supreme Court is the only one responsible for inciting religious wars in India. This statement not only reflects poorly on Dubey’s understanding of the role of the judiciary, but also poses a significant threat to the institution’s independence and impartiality.
The SCBA, which represents the interests of lawyers and advocates practicing in the Supreme Court, has taken a strong stance against Dubey’s remarks. In its resolution, the organization stated that Dubey’s statement is not only defamatory but also amounts to contempt of the Supreme Court. “This attack on the judiciary is unacceptable and we condemn it in the strongest possible terms,” the SCBA said.
The SCBA’s resolution is a significant development, as it reflects the widespread condemnation of Dubey’s statement from across the legal fraternity. The organization’s stand is a clear indication that the judiciary is not going to take Dubey’s remarks lying down. The SCBA’s condemnation of Dubey’s statement is also a timely reminder of the importance of maintaining the independence and impartiality of the judiciary.
The SCBA’s resolution is not only a reaction to Dubey’s statement, but also a broader commentary on the current state of affairs in the country. The organization’s stand is a reflection of the growing concern among lawyers and advocates about the increasing trend of politicians and public figures making personal attacks on judges and the judiciary.
In recent times, we have seen a number of instances where judges and judges have been targeted by political leaders and public figures. These attacks have not only undermined the authority of the judiciary, but also created a sense of unease and intimidation among judges and lawyers. The SCBA’s resolution is a clear indication that the legal fraternity is not going to tolerate such attacks and is willing to take a stand against them.
The SCBA’s resolution is also significant because it highlights the importance of maintaining the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The judiciary is supposed to be an independent and impartial institution, and any attack on it can undermine its authority and credibility. The SCBA’s condemnation of Dubey’s statement is a reminder that the judiciary needs to be protected and defended, and that any attack on it is unacceptable.
The SCBA’s resolution is also a call to action for the government and political leaders to take a stand against such attacks. The government has a responsibility to ensure that the judiciary is protected and defended, and that any attack on it is condemned in the strongest possible terms. The SCBA’s resolution is a reminder that the government needs to take a strong stand against such attacks and ensure that the judiciary is protected and defended.
In conclusion, the SCBA’s resolution condemning Dubey’s statement is a significant development, and reflects the widespread condemnation of his remarks from across the legal fraternity. The organization’s stand is a clear indication that the judiciary is not going to take Dubey’s remarks lying down, and that any attack on it is unacceptable. The SCBA’s resolution is also a reminder of the importance of maintaining the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, and the need for the government and political leaders to take a strong stand against any attack on it.
