Congress Sounding Like the 12th Man of Pakistan: Kesavan on Khurshid’s Post
In a recent post on social media, Congress leader Salman Khurshid sparked a heated debate by asking, “Is it so difficult to be patriotic?” Many interpreted the question as a veiled attack on the ruling BJP, which has been accused of divisive politics and erosion of national unity. However, the question has also been seen as a reflection of the Congress party’s own stance on nationalism.
BJP leader CR Kesavan was quick to respond to Khurshid’s post, saying that the Congress is “sounding more like the 12th man of Pakistan.” Kesavan’s comment is a powerful indictment of the Congress party’s stance on nationalism and patriotism, suggesting that the party is more interested in criticizing others than in promoting national unity.
The Congress party has a long history of toeing the line of international pressure and global trends, often sacrificing national interests in the process. The party’s recent posturing on nationalism is nothing more than a desperate attempt to regain its lost relevance and popularity.
Khurshid’s question “Is it so difficult to be patriotic?” is a cleverly crafted attempt to shift the narrative away from the Congress party’s own failures and towards the BJP. The Congress party has been plagued by internal conflicts, corruption scandals, and a lack of direction, which has led to a significant decline in its popularity.
By asking this question, Khurshid is trying to imply that the BJP is unpatriotic and that the Congress party is the true champion of national unity. However, this is a flawed argument, as the BJP has always been committed to promoting national interests and protecting the sovereignty of the country.
In fact, the BJP has been at the forefront of several initiatives aimed at promoting national unity and boosting patriotism. The party’s flagship schemes, such as the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan and the Ayushman Bharat Yojana, have been instrumental in promoting national pride and unity.
On the other hand, the Congress party has a checkered history of promoting divisive politics and undermining national unity. The party’s appeasement policies towards minority communities have often been seen as a threat to national security and sovereignty.
Kurshid’s post is also a reflection of the Congress party’s lack of understanding of the concept of nationalism. Nationalism is not about blindly following a particular ideology or party, but about promoting national interests and protecting the sovereignty of the country.
The Congress party’s obsession with criticizing the BJP and promoting its own ideology has led it to abandon its commitment to national unity and sovereignty. This is evident from the party’s recent stance on several key issues, such as the abrogation of Article 370 and the passage of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act.
In conclusion, Khurshid’s post “Is it so difficult to be patriotic?” is a cleverly crafted attempt to shift the narrative away from the Congress party’s own failures and towards the BJP. The Congress party’s stance on nationalism is nothing more than a desperate attempt to regain its lost relevance and popularity.
As CR Kesavan aptly put it, the Congress party is “sounding more like the 12th man of Pakistan” – a party that is more interested in promoting its own ideology and interests rather than promoting national unity and sovereignty.
