Congress has some sane voices: Kerala BJP chief on Shashi Tharoor
In a rare moment of bipartisanship, Kerala BJP President Rajeev Chandrasekhar has praised Congress MP Shashi Tharoor for his stance on the recent Pahalgam terror attack. Chandrasekhar’s remarks come as a surprise, given the usual animosity between the BJP and the Congress. However, his comments highlight the fact that even in the midst of political differences, there are voices on both sides that can come together to condemn terrorism and extremism.
Tharoor had recently expressed his condolences to the families of the victims of the Pahalgam terror attack, which claimed the lives of several civilians, including women and children. He also emphasized the need for the government to take concrete steps to prevent such attacks in the future. Chandrasekhar’s comments in support of Tharoor’s stance are a welcome change in the political discourse, which is often marred by rhetoric and polarization.
Chandrasekhar’s praise for Tharoor is significant because it highlights the importance of having sane voices in politics. In an era where political differences often lead to personal attacks and vitriolic rhetoric, it is refreshing to see leaders from different parties coming together to condemn terrorism and extremism. Tharoor’s statement on the Pahalgam terror attack was a powerful expression of condolence and solidarity with the victims, and it is heartening to see Chandrasekhar acknowledging his efforts.
However, Chandrasekhar’s comments also touched on the issue of political hypocrisy, highlighting the fact that there are some political leaders who are quick to jump to defend Pakistan, even when it is clear that the country has no role to play in the violence and terrorism that is plaguing our region. He specifically mentioned Siddaramaiah, a senior Congress leader from Karnataka, who had recently sparked controversy by saying that Pakistan was not involved in the Pahalgam terror attack.
Chandrasekhar’s remarks about Siddaramaiah are a reflection of the growing frustration among many Indians with the political class’s inability to tackle terrorism and extremism. While it is understandable that political leaders may have different opinions on how to address these issues, it is unacceptable for them to defend the perpetrators of violence and terror. Siddaramaiah’s comments were seen as insensitive and irresponsible, and they only served to fuel the growing anger and frustration among the public.
In conclusion, Chandrasekhar’s praise for Tharoor’s stance on the Pahalgam terror attack is a welcome change in the political discourse. It highlights the importance of having sane voices in politics, and it emphasizes the need for leaders to come together to condemn terrorism and extremism. At the same time, Chandrasekhar’s comments about Siddaramaiah serve as a reminder of the political class’s failures to address these issues effectively. As we move forward, it is essential for political leaders to put aside their differences and work together to create a safer and more secure India for all citizens.
