China Condemned Pahalgam Attack but Backs Pakistan: Jagdambika Pal
The recent conflict between India and Pakistan has sparked widespread concern and outrage globally. As the two nuclear-armed neighbors continue to engage in a war of words, it’s crucial to examine the reactions of other countries to this escalating situation. In a recent statement, BJP leader Jagdambika Pal shed light on China’s stance on the conflict, highlighting the country’s seeming inconsistency.
According to Pal, China initially condemned the Pahalgam attack, which was carried out by Pakistani-based terrorists. However, despite this condemnation, China continues to maintain its ties with Pakistan. This dichotomy has raised eyebrows, with many questioning China’s true intentions.
Pal’s comments came as India and Pakistan were engaged in a tense standoff, with each side accusing the other of aggression. The situation escalated when Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terrorists attacked a bus carrying Hindu pilgrims in Pahalgam, Kashmir, killing several people and injuring many more.
In the aftermath of the attack, India launched airstrikes against Pakistan, destroying several terrorist camps and key infrastructure, including air bases in Rawalpindi. Pakistan, meanwhile, claimed that India had launched a “blatant aggression” and vowed to retaliate.
As the situation continued to deteriorate, the international community began to weigh in on the conflict. Many countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union, condemned the terrorist attack and urged both sides to exercise restraint.
However, not all countries took a unified stance. Pal pointed out that while the whole world supported India, two Islamic countries, Türkiye and Azerbaijan, did not condemn the attack. “The whole world supported India, even Islamic countries like UAE, except Türkiye and Azerbaijan,” he said.
Pal’s comments also touched on China’s relationship with Pakistan. Despite being a close ally of Pakistan, China has always maintained a delicate balance in its relations with both India and Pakistan. However, Pal’s statement suggests that China’s condemnation of the Pahalgam attack was more of a diplomatic gesture than a genuine expression of outrage.
India has long been wary of China’s intentions in the region, particularly its close ties with Pakistan. China has invested heavily in Pakistan’s infrastructure, including the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which has raised concerns about China’s strategic interests in the region.
Pal’s statement highlights the complexities of international diplomacy and the often-competing interests of nations. While China may have condemned the Pahalgam attack, its continued support for Pakistan and criticism of India’s response to the attack suggest that its true loyalties lie with Islamabad.
As the situation in Kashmir continues to unfold, it’s essential for India to maintain its resolve and ensure the safety and security of its citizens. The international community must also continue to condemn terrorism in all its forms and urge both sides to engage in meaningful dialogue to resolve their differences peacefully.
In conclusion, Jagdambika Pal’s statement serves as a reminder of the complexities of international diplomacy and the need for nations to stand united against terrorism. As the world watches the situation in Kashmir unfold, it’s crucial that we all remain vigilant and committed to promoting peace and stability in the region.
