Arrest 4-5 ministers & govt is gone: Owaisi on PM-CM removal Bills
Asaduddin Owaisi, the President of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM), has sparked a heated debate with his recent remarks on the Constitution (130th) Amendment Bill. The bill, which is currently making its way through Parliament, proposes to introduce provisions for the removal of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and ministers who have been arrested for at least 30 days.
Owaisi, speaking at a public event, took aim at the proposed bill, saying that it would give the President the authority to remove the Prime Minister at will. “Just arrest four-five ministers, and government is gone,” he said, implying that the bill would create a situation where the government could be toppled by simply arresting a few key ministers.
The AIMIM chief also expressed his dismay at the fact that the bill was being introduced without any prior discussion or debate. “This proposed bill is saying that the President can remove the Prime Minister. What is this?” he asked, his tone laced with incredulity.
Owaisi’s remarks have sparked a sharp reaction from the government, with many BJP leaders defending the bill as a necessary measure to ensure accountability and transparency in governance. However, opponents of the bill have raised concerns about the potential for abuse and the erosion of the separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.
The Constitution (130th) Amendment Bill is part of a broader package of reforms aimed at strengthening the country’s institutions and improving governance. The government has argued that the bill is necessary to prevent the misuse of Article 74 of the Constitution, which allows the President to act on the advice of the Prime Minister. The bill would give the President the power to remove the Prime Minister if they are found to be in contempt of court or if they are involved in corrupt practices.
However, critics of the bill argue that it would create a situation where the President could arbitrarily remove the Prime Minister, without any prior notice or justification. They also point out that the bill would undermine the principle of collective responsibility, which is a fundamental aspect of parliamentary democracy.
The debate surrounding the Constitution (130th) Amendment Bill is not new. The bill has been making its way through Parliament for several years, and has been the subject of intense scrutiny and debate. However, the recent remarks by Owaisi have added a new layer of controversy to the debate, highlighting the concerns of many citizens about the potential for abuse and the erosion of democratic norms.
In conclusion, the remarks by Owaisi have sparked a heated debate about the Constitution (130th) Amendment Bill, which is currently making its way through Parliament. While the bill is intended to strengthen the country’s institutions and improve governance, critics argue that it would create a situation where the President could arbitrarily remove the Prime Minister, without any prior notice or justification. The debate is an important one, and highlights the need for careful consideration and scrutiny of any proposed reforms to the country’s constitution.
