Arrest 4-5 ministers & govt is gone: Owaisi on PM-CM removal Bills
In a recent development, the AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi has stirred up a storm by making a bold statement on the Constitution (130th) Amendment Bill, which proposes to provide for the removal of Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, and ministers arrested for at least 30 days. According to Owaisi, the proposed bill is a threat to the democratic fabric of the country and can lead to the collapse of the government if implemented.
Speaking on the matter, Owaisi stated, “Just arrest four-five ministers, and government is gone.” His statement sent shockwaves across the political spectrum, with many interpreting it as a warning to the government to be cautious while dealing with ministers who have been arrested.
Owaisi’s comments were made in response to the proposed bill, which aims to strengthen the President’s powers to remove the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and ministers from office. Under the proposed bill, the President can remove the Prime Minister if the latter is arrested for at least 30 days and the President is satisfied that the Prime Minister is unable to perform their duties.
However, Owaisi has been vocal in his opposition to the bill, stating that it is an attempt to undermine the democratic process and is a threat to the country’s institutions. In a tweet, Owaisi wrote, “This proposed bill is saying that the President can remove the Prime Minister. What is this? Is this a joke or what?”
Owaisi’s concerns are not unfounded. The proposed bill has been criticized by many political leaders and experts, who argue that it is a power grab by the President and an attempt to undermine the democratic process. The bill has also been accused of being unconstitutional and a threat to the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government.
Furthermore, Owaisi has also expressed concerns about the potential misuse of the proposed bill. He has warned that the bill can be used to target political opponents and undermine the democratic process. In an interview, Owaisi stated, “This bill is a recipe for disaster. It can be used to target political opponents and undermine the democratic process.”
Owaisi’s comments have been met with criticism from some quarters, who have accused him of being alarmist and exaggerating the potential consequences of the proposed bill. However, Owaisi’s concerns are not without merit. The proposed bill has the potential to undermine the democratic process and is a threat to the country’s institutions.
In conclusion, Owaisi’s statement highlights the potential dangers of the proposed bill and the need for careful consideration of its implications. The bill has the potential to undermine the democratic process and is a threat to the country’s institutions. It is essential that political leaders and experts carefully consider the potential consequences of the proposed bill and work towards finding a solution that is in the best interests of the country.
