
Rahul Opposes SIR as Infiltrators are Their Vote Bank: Amit Shah
Union Home Minister Amit Shah, while addressing a gathering in Bihar, sparked a controversy by stating that Congress leader Rahul Gandhi opposes the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process because infiltrators are their vote bank. The SIR process aims to remove duplicate and fake voters from the electoral roll.
Before the upcoming assembly elections in Bihar, Shah questioned whether the names of infiltrators should be removed from the voter list or not. He also emphasized that the Constitution of India does not give the right to vote to those who are not born in India.
Shah’s statement has been met with criticism from the opposition, with many terming it as an attempt to divide the people on the basis of religion and nationality. The opposition has also accused the ruling BJP of using the SIR process as a tool to disenfranchise certain communities.
However, Shah’s statement has also been seen as a attempt to counter the opposition’s narrative on the SIR process. The opposition has been accusing the government of trying to suppress the votes of certain communities through the SIR process.
The SIR process was launched by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in 2019 to ensure the integrity of the electoral process. The process aims to remove duplicate and fake voters from the electoral roll, and to ensure that only eligible voters are included in the voters’ list.
The opposition has been accusing the government of using the SIR process to target certain communities, including Muslims and Dalits. They have been claiming that the SIR process is a ploy to disenfranchise these communities and to ensure that the BJP wins the upcoming assembly elections.
However, Shah’s statement has also been seen as an attempt to counter the opposition’s narrative on the SIR process. He has been insisting that the SIR process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process, and that it is not targeted at any particular community.
The SIR process has been a contentious issue in the run-up to the assembly elections in Bihar. The opposition has been accusing the government of using the process to suppress the votes of certain communities, while the government has been insisting that the process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.
Shah’s statement has also been seen as an attempt to counter the opposition’s narrative on the SIR process. He has been insisting that the SIR process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process, and that it is not targeted at any particular community.
The opposition has been accusing the government of using the SIR process to target certain communities, including Muslims and Dalits. They have been claiming that the SIR process is a ploy to disenfranchise these communities and to ensure that the BJP wins the upcoming assembly elections.
However, Shah’s statement has also been seen as an attempt to counter the opposition’s narrative on the SIR process. He has been insisting that the SIR process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process, and that it is not targeted at any particular community.
The SIR process has been a contentious issue in the run-up to the assembly elections in Bihar. The opposition has been accusing the government of using the process to suppress the votes of certain communities, while the government has been insisting that the process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.
Shah’s statement has also been seen as an attempt to counter the opposition’s narrative on the SIR process. He has been insisting that the SIR process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process, and that it is not targeted at any particular community.
The opposition has been accusing the government of using the SIR process to target certain communities, including Muslims and Dalits. They have been claiming that the SIR process is a ploy to disenfranchise these communities and to ensure that the BJP wins the upcoming assembly elections.
However, Shah’s statement has also been seen as an attempt to counter the opposition’s narrative on the SIR process. He has been insisting that the SIR process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process, and that it is not targeted at any particular community.
The SIR process has been a contentious issue in the run-up to the assembly elections in Bihar. The opposition has been accusing the government of using the process to suppress the votes of certain communities, while the government has been insisting that the process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.
In conclusion, Shah’s statement has been met with criticism from the opposition, with many terming it as an attempt to divide the people on the basis of religion and nationality. However, the government has been insisting that the SIR process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process, and that it is not targeted at any particular community.
The opposition has been accusing the government of using the SIR process to target certain communities, including Muslims and Dalits. They have been claiming that the SIR process is a ploy to disenfranchise these communities and to ensure that the BJP wins the upcoming assembly elections.
However, Shah’s statement has also been seen as an attempt to counter the opposition’s narrative on the SIR process. He has been insisting that the SIR process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process, and that it is not targeted at any particular community.
The SIR process has been a contentious issue in the run-up to the assembly elections in Bihar. The opposition has been accusing the government of using the process to suppress the votes of certain communities, while the government has been insisting that the process is aimed at ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.
In the end, it is up to the people of Bihar to decide whether they will stand with the government or the opposition. It is up to them to decide whether they will allow the SIR process to be used as a tool to divide the people on the basis of religion and nationality, or whether they will stand with the government in its efforts to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.