No maintenance if wife contributes to man’s inability to earn: HC
In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has stated that if a wife’s actions or omissions contribute to her husband’s inability to earn, she cannot claim maintenance from him. This judgment was passed while hearing a plea by a woman who was seeking maintenance from her doctor husband. The court rejected her petition, citing that her own actions had led to her husband’s inability to earn a living.
The case in question involved a woman who had filed a petition claiming maintenance from her husband, a doctor by profession. However, the husband had alleged that his brother-in-law and father-in-law had shot at him during an altercation, leaving him unable to earn or provide maintenance. The husband claimed that the wife’s actions and those of her family members had led to his current state of being unable to work.
The court, after considering the evidence and arguments presented, ruled in favor of the husband. The judges stated that if a wife’s actions or omissions contribute to her husband’s inability to earn, she cannot claim maintenance from him. This ruling is significant, as it highlights the importance of considering the circumstances leading to a person’s inability to earn, rather than simply assuming that the husband is responsible for providing maintenance.
The concept of maintenance is an important aspect of family law, particularly in cases where one spouse is unable to support themselves financially. In India, the law provides for maintenance to be paid by one spouse to the other in certain circumstances, such as during divorce proceedings or if one spouse is unable to earn a living. However, the law also takes into account the circumstances leading to a person’s inability to earn, and this ruling by the Allahabad High Court reinforces this principle.
In this case, the court found that the wife’s actions, along with those of her family members, had led to her husband’s inability to earn. The altercation that resulted in the husband being shot at was a direct consequence of the wife’s actions, and therefore, the court ruled that she could not claim maintenance from him. This ruling highlights the importance of considering the role of both spouses in contributing to a situation, rather than simply assuming that one spouse is responsible for providing maintenance.
The court’s decision is also significant in that it emphasizes the need for spouses to take responsibility for their actions. If a spouse’s actions or omissions contribute to their partner’s inability to earn, they cannot simply expect the other spouse to provide maintenance. This ruling encourages spouses to take an active role in resolving conflicts and finding solutions, rather than resorting to violence or other forms of aggression.
It is also worth noting that this ruling does not mean that wives are never entitled to maintenance. In cases where a husband is able to earn but refuses to provide maintenance, the wife is still entitled to claim maintenance. However, in cases where the wife’s actions or omissions contribute to the husband’s inability to earn, the court will take this into account when determining whether maintenance should be awarded.
In conclusion, the Allahabad High Court’s ruling that a wife cannot claim maintenance from her husband if her actions or omissions contribute to his inability to earn is a significant one. This judgment highlights the importance of considering the circumstances leading to a person’s inability to earn, and the need for spouses to take responsibility for their actions. The court’s decision is a reminder that maintenance is not simply a matter of one spouse providing for the other, but rather a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of each case.
Source: https://repository.inshorts.com/articles/en/PTI/dbbe1fad-7e39-43f2-8728-ba0777cf95e5
About the Author
