Litigants to now get court fee back even in private deals in Delhi
In a significant move, the Delhi Assembly has passed an amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, which is set to bring relief to litigants in the city. As per the new amendment, a petitioner will now be entitled to a full refund of court fees even if disputes are settled outside the court. This move is expected to benefit litigants who often have to bear the burden of court fees, even if they are able to resolve their disputes through private settlements.
Currently, petitioners in Delhi receive a 100% refund of court fees only when disputes are resolved through court-referred alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms, such as mediation or arbitration. However, if a dispute is settled through a private agreement between the parties, the petitioner is only eligible for a 50% refund of the court fees paid. This has long been a point of contention among litigants, who feel that they should not be penalized for seeking to resolve their disputes amicably.
The new amendment aims to address this issue by providing for a full refund of court fees in all cases where a dispute is settled, regardless of whether it is through a court-referred ADR mechanism or a private settlement. This move is expected to encourage more litigants to explore alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, which can be less time-consuming and less costly than traditional litigation.
The benefits of this amendment are likely to be far-reaching. For one, it will provide a significant financial relief to litigants who have been bearing the burden of court fees for years. Court fees can be a significant expense, especially in complex cases where multiple petitions and appeals are filed. By providing for a full refund of court fees, the Delhi Assembly is recognizing the fact that litigants should not be penalized for seeking to resolve their disputes through private means.
Moreover, this amendment is also likely to reduce the burden on the courts in Delhi. By encouraging private settlements, the courts will have to deal with fewer cases, which will help to reduce the backlog of pending cases. This, in turn, will help to speed up the justice delivery system, which is a critical aspect of any functioning democracy.
Another significant benefit of this amendment is that it will promote the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. ADR mechanisms, such as mediation and arbitration, have been shown to be effective in resolving disputes in a less adversarial and less costly manner. By providing for a full refund of court fees in cases where disputes are settled through private means, the Delhi Assembly is sending a strong signal that it encourages the use of ADR mechanisms.
It is also worth noting that this amendment is in line with the national trend of promoting alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of ADR mechanisms in resolving disputes in a timely and cost-effective manner. The Supreme Court of India has also been promoting the use of ADR mechanisms, and has encouraged courts across the country to establish mediation centers and other ADR facilities.
In conclusion, the amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, passed by the Delhi Assembly, is a significant move that is likely to benefit litigants in the city. By providing for a full refund of court fees in all cases where a dispute is settled, regardless of whether it is through a court-referred ADR mechanism or a private settlement, the Delhi Assembly is recognizing the fact that litigants should not be penalized for seeking to resolve their disputes through private means. This move is expected to reduce the burden on the courts, promote the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and provide financial relief to litigants.
About the Author
