Litigants to now get court fee back even in private deals in Delhi
In a significant move, the Delhi Assembly has passed an amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, which is set to benefit litigants in a big way. As per the amendment, a petitioner will now be eligible to receive a full refund of court fees even if disputes are settled outside the court through private deals. This is a major departure from the existing rule, where petitioners were entitled to a 100% refund of court fees only when disputes were resolved through court-referred alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes. In cases of private settlements, petitioners were only eligible for a 50% refund of court fees.
The amendment is expected to bring relief to litigants who often have to spend a significant amount of money on court fees, only to have their disputes settled out of court. The new rule will ensure that petitioners are not financially burdened by the court fees, even if they are able to resolve their disputes through private negotiations. This move is seen as a step towards reducing the financial burden on litigants and promoting out-of-court settlements.
The Court Fees Act, 1870, is a colonial-era law that governs the payment of court fees in India. The law requires litigants to pay a fee to the court when filing a petition or appeal. The fee is typically a percentage of the value of the claim or the relief sought. The court fees can be substantial, and often, litigants have to spend a significant amount of money on court fees, even before their case is heard.
The existing rule, which only allowed a 100% refund of court fees in cases of court-referred ADR, was seen as unfair to litigants who were able to resolve their disputes through private negotiations. Many litigants were forced to opt for court-referred ADR simply to get a full refund of their court fees, rather than pursuing a private settlement that might have been more beneficial to them.
The amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, is expected to change this scenario. With the new rule, litigants will be able to pursue private settlements without worrying about losing out on their court fees. This is likely to lead to an increase in out-of-court settlements, which can help reduce the burden on the judicial system.
The move is also seen as a step towards promoting access to justice. Many litigants are deterred from approaching the courts due to the high court fees. The new rule will make it easier for litigants to approach the courts, knowing that they will be able to get a full refund of their court fees even if their dispute is settled out of court.
The amendment is also expected to benefit the judicial system as a whole. By promoting out-of-court settlements, the new rule can help reduce the backlog of cases in the courts. This can help speed up the disposal of cases and reduce the burden on judges and court staff.
In addition, the new rule can also help reduce the costs associated with litigation. Litigants often have to spend a significant amount of money on lawyers’ fees, court fees, and other expenses. By promoting out-of-court settlements, the new rule can help reduce these costs and make the judicial system more accessible to all.
Overall, the amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, is a welcome move that is expected to benefit litigants in a big way. By allowing petitioners to receive a full refund of court fees even in cases of private settlements, the new rule can help reduce the financial burden on litigants and promote access to justice.
The move is also seen as a step towards modernizing the judicial system in India. The Court Fees Act, 1870, is a colonial-era law that has been in need of reform for a long time. The amendment is a significant step towards reforming the law and making it more relevant to the needs of modern litigants.
In conclusion, the amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, is a significant move that is expected to benefit litigants in Delhi. By allowing petitioners to receive a full refund of court fees even in cases of private settlements, the new rule can help reduce the financial burden on litigants and promote access to justice. The move is also seen as a step towards promoting out-of-court settlements and reducing the burden on the judicial system.
About the Author
