Litigants to now get court fee back even in private deals in Delhi
In a significant development, the Delhi Assembly has passed an amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, which will have a profound impact on the way court fees are refunded to litigants in the national capital. As per the new amendment, a petitioner will now be eligible to receive a full refund of court fees even if disputes are settled outside the court through private deals. This move is expected to bring relief to numerous litigants who were earlier entitled to a partial refund of court fees in case of private settlements.
Currently, the court fee refund system in Delhi operates on a conditional basis. If a dispute is resolved through court-referred alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms, such as mediation or arbitration, the petitioner is entitled to a 100% refund of the court fees paid. However, in cases where disputes are settled privately, without the involvement of the court, the petitioner is only eligible for a 50% refund of the court fees. This disparity in refund rates has long been a point of contention among litigants, who have been advocating for a more equitable and just system.
The amendment passed by the Delhi Assembly seeks to address this issue by providing a full refund of court fees to petitioners, regardless of whether the dispute is settled through court-referred ADR or private deals. This move is expected to benefit a large number of litigants who are forced to settle their disputes outside the court due to various reasons, including the lengthy and cumbersome court procedures, high litigation costs, and the uncertainty of outcomes.
The new amendment will not only provide financial relief to litigants but also promote the concept of alternative dispute resolution in the national capital. By providing a full refund of court fees, the Delhi government is incentivizing litigants to explore private settlements and ADR mechanisms, which can help reduce the burden on the courts and expedite the dispute resolution process.
The benefits of this amendment are multifaceted. Firstly, it will help reduce the financial burden on litigants, who often have to spend a significant amount of money on court fees, lawyer fees, and other expenses related to litigation. Secondly, it will promote the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, which can help resolve disputes in a more efficient and cost-effective manner. Finally, it will help reduce the backlog of cases in Delhi courts, which is a major concern for the judiciary and the government.
The Delhi government’s decision to amend the Court Fees Act, 1870, is a welcome move, and it is expected to have a positive impact on the justice delivery system in the national capital. The amendment is a step in the right direction, as it seeks to address the long-standing issue of court fee refunds and promote alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.
In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on alternative dispute resolution in India, with the government and the judiciary taking various steps to promote this concept. The establishment of mediation centers, the introduction of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the promotion of online dispute resolution platforms are some of the initiatives that have been taken to encourage the use of ADR mechanisms.
The amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, is another significant step in this direction. By providing a full refund of court fees to petitioners, the Delhi government is sending a strong message that it is committed to promoting alternative dispute resolution and reducing the burden on the courts.
In conclusion, the amendment to the Court Fees Act, 1870, is a significant development that will have a positive impact on the justice delivery system in Delhi. The provision of a full refund of court fees to petitioners, regardless of whether the dispute is settled through court-referred ADR or private deals, is a welcome move that will benefit a large number of litigants. The Delhi government’s decision to amend the Act is a step in the right direction, and it is expected to promote the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, reduce the burden on the courts, and provide financial relief to litigants.
About the Author
