Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
In a move that has sparked sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups, the South Western Railway in Bengaluru has excluded Kannada as a medium from an exam, allowing only Hindi and English. The decision has been widely criticized, with many arguing that it reflects a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones. The controversy has once again brought to the forefront the sensitive issue of language and regional identity in India.
The exam in question was conducted by the South Western Railway in Bengaluru, the capital city of Karnataka, a state where Kannada is the official language. However, in a surprising move, the railway authorities decided to conduct the exam only in Hindi and English, excluding Kannada altogether. This decision has been seen as a snub to the local language and has triggered widespread outrage among Kannada-speaking people.
Pro-Kannada groups have been quick to condemn the move, arguing that it is a deliberate attempt to undermine the importance of Kannada in the state. They point out that Kannada is the official language of Karnataka and that it is only fair that it should be included as a medium of examination. The exclusion of Kannada, they argue, is a clear example of the systemic bias that exists in the country, favoring Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones.
BJP leader CT Ravi has also weighed in on the issue, calling it a “technical injustice”. He argued that the decision to exclude Kannada from the exam is a clear violation of the rights of Kannada-speaking candidates and that it is essential to include the local language in the examination process. Ravi’s comments have been seen as a reflection of the growing sentiment among Kannada-speaking people, who feel that their language and culture are being marginalized.
The controversy has also sparked a wider debate about the role of language in India. While Hindi is the official language of the country, many states have their own official languages, which are an integral part of their cultural identity. The exclusion of Kannada from the exam has raised questions about the importance of regional languages and the need to promote and protect them.
In recent years, there have been several instances of language-related controversies in India. The imposition of Hindi as a compulsory subject in schools has been met with resistance from non-Hindi speaking states, who argue that it is an attempt to impose a particular language and culture on them. The controversy over the railway exam in Bengaluru is just the latest example of this ongoing debate.
The South Western Railway has defended its decision, arguing that the exam was conducted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Railway Recruitment Board. However, this explanation has done little to placate the pro-Kannada groups, who argue that the rules and regulations should be flexible enough to accommodate the local language.
As the controversy continues to simmer, it remains to be seen how the issue will be resolved. The Karnataka government has promised to take up the matter with the railway authorities and to ensure that Kannada is included as a medium of examination in the future. However, the damage has already been done, and the incident has once again highlighted the sensitive issue of language and regional identity in India.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a row that goes beyond the issue of language. It has raised questions about the importance of regional languages and the need to promote and protect them. The controversy has also highlighted the systemic bias that exists in the country, favoring Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones. As the debate continues, it is essential to recognize the importance of regional languages and to ensure that they are given their due place in the country’s cultural and linguistic landscape.
About the Author
