Kannada language excluded from railway exam in B’luru, sparks row
The city of Bengaluru, the capital of Karnataka, has been at the center of a linguistic controversy in recent days. The South Western Railway, which operates in the region, conducted an exam for various positions, but with a notable exception – Kannada, the local language, was not included as a medium of examination. Instead, only Hindi and English were allowed, sparking sharp protests from pro-Kannada groups who see this as a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones.
The exam, which was conducted by the South Western Railway, is a recruitment drive for various positions in the railway department. However, the decision to exclude Kannada as a medium of examination has raised questions about the railway’s commitment to promoting regional languages. Pro-Kannada groups have argued that this move is a deliberate attempt to undermine the importance of Kannada, the official language of Karnataka, and to favor candidates from other parts of the country who are more proficient in Hindi.
The issue has sparked a heated debate, with many arguing that the exclusion of Kannada is a “technical injustice” perpetuated by the railway authorities. BJP leader CT Ravi has also weighed in on the issue, calling it a “technical injustice” and demanding that the railway authorities take immediate action to rectify the situation. Ravi argued that the decision to exclude Kannada is a clear example of the bias that exists in the system, where local languages are often marginalized in favor of Hindi and English.
The controversy has also raised questions about the status of Kannada in the state of Karnataka. With Bengaluru being a cosmopolitan city with a significant presence of people from other parts of the country, there has been a growing concern that the local language is being slowly eroded. The exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam has only added fuel to the fire, with many arguing that this is a deliberate attempt to undermine the importance of the language.
Pro-Kannada groups have been vocal in their protests, arguing that the decision to exclude Kannada is a clear example of the systemic bias that exists in the country. They have demanded that the railway authorities take immediate action to include Kannada as a medium of examination, and have threatened to intensify their protests if their demands are not met.
The issue has also sparked a wider debate about the role of language in recruitment exams. Many have argued that language should not be a barrier to employment, and that candidates should be allowed to take exams in their local language. This, they argue, would help to promote regional languages and ensure that local candidates are not disadvantaged.
On the other hand, some have argued that the use of Hindi and English as mediums of examination is necessary to ensure that candidates from other parts of the country are not disadvantaged. They argue that these languages are widely spoken and understood, and that using them as mediums of examination would help to ensure that the recruitment process is fair and transparent.
However, this argument has been rejected by pro-Kannada groups, who argue that the use of Hindi and English as mediums of examination is a clear example of the bias that exists in the system. They argue that local languages should be given priority, and that candidates should be allowed to take exams in their local language.
The controversy has also raised questions about the commitment of the railway authorities to promoting regional languages. The railway department has been accused of being insensitive to the linguistic diversity of the country, and of favoring Hindi and English over local languages.
In conclusion, the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam in Bengaluru has sparked a major controversy, with many arguing that it is a systemic bias designed to favor Hindi-speaking candidates over local ones. The issue has raised questions about the status of Kannada in the state of Karnataka, and has sparked a wider debate about the role of language in recruitment exams. As the protests continue to grow, it remains to be seen how the railway authorities will respond to the demands of pro-Kannada groups.
For now, the controversy has highlighted the need for greater sensitivity and awareness about the linguistic diversity of the country. It has also underscored the importance of promoting regional languages, and of ensuring that local candidates are not disadvantaged in recruitment exams.
As the debate continues to rage, one thing is clear – the exclusion of Kannada from the railway exam in Bengaluru is a sensitive issue that requires immediate attention. The railway authorities must take steps to address the concerns of pro-Kannada groups, and to ensure that local languages are given the priority they deserve.
About the Author
